CAD97

import javax.swing.*;
import java.awt.*;
import java.awt.geom.Area;
import java.util.List;

/**
 * Animate Polygons around on a Graphics object.
 *
 * @author Christopher Durham
 * @date 11/25/2016

CAD97

CAD97

<?import javafx.scene.control.TextField?>
<?import tornadofx.Field?>
<?import tornadofx.Fieldset?>
<?import tornadofx.Form?>
<Form xmlns="http://javafx.com/javafx/null" xmlns:fx="http://javafx.com/fxml/1">
    <Fieldset>
        <!--Field text=""-->
        <Field>
            <TextField/>
        </Field>

CAD97

This is a potential crate that would simplify the use of the example-lib pattern for slog.

The motivation is the same as that of the example-lib: a library using slog for its logging would like to accept a parent logger if the crate pulling it in is using slog, or fall back to interfacing with log's static logger if not.

At any entry point to your library's interface, you would retrieve the Logger from your lazy slog. After that point, you would pass it around and create child loggers like normal.

CAD97

[
	{ "name": "Ophilia"                     , "types": ["Ophilia"]  },
	{ "name": "Ophilia - Heal Wounds"       , "types": ["Ophilia"]  },
	{ "name": "Ophilia - Holy Light"        , "types": ["Ophilia"]  },
	{ "name": "Ophilia - Sheltering Veil"   , "types": ["Ophilia"]  },
	{ "name": "Ophilia - Luminescence"      , "types": ["Ophilia"]  },
	{ "name": "Ophilia - Heal More"         , "types": ["Ophilia"]  },
	{ "name": "Ophilia - Reflective Veil"   , "types": ["Ophilia"]  },
	{ "name": "Ophilia - Revive"            , "types": ["Ophilia"]  },
	{ "name": "Cyrus"                       , "types": ["Cyrus"]    },

CAD97

// builtin derives collapsed and other cleanup applied manually
mod parser {
    use pest::{
        error::Error,
        iterators::{Pair, Pairs},
        Parser,
    };

    pub struct MyParser;

CAD97

I am the Miaou user with id 6845 and name "cad97" on https://miaou.dystroy.org

CAD97

Policy draft: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ErZlwz9bbSI43dNo-rgQdkovm2h5ycuW220mWSOAuok/edit?usp=sharing Comment form: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSdaM4pdWFsLJ8GHIUFIhepuq0lfTg_b0mJ-hvwPdHa4UTRaAg/viewform

(Obvious) Disclaimer: The material in these notes have not been reviewed, endorsed, or approved of by the Rust Foundation, but they have been submitted and hopefully will be reviewed. The current policy can be seen here: https://foundation.rust-lang.org/policies/logo-policy-and-media-guide/

The comment, exactly as submitted, is reproduced below:

---

TL;DR: The proposed policy places significant new restrictions on the use of the Rust® name which are not present in the current policy. This extension to the policy is unnecessary and presupposes that a simple mention of the Rust® Programming Language could be misconstrued as implying endorsement from the Rust® Foundation.

CAD97

use std::future::Future;
use std::marker::PhantomData;
use std::ops::{Deref, DerefMut};
use std::pin::Pin;
use std::ptr::{drop_in_place, NonNull};
use std::task::{Context, Poll};

// example

fn main() {

CAD97

use std::future::Future;
use std::convert::Infallible;

#[derive(Debug, Copy, Clone)]
pub struct Coercion<T: ?Sized, U: ?Sized>(fn(*mut T) -> *mut U);

impl<T: ?Sized, U: ?Sized> Coercion<T, U> {
    #[inline]
    pub unsafe fn new(f: fn(*mut T) -> *mut U) -> Self {
        Coercion(f)