You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
My focus for this module was to continue supporting my cohort and the community in their learning process, while also furthering my own understanding of front-end technologies and tools. Specifically, I wanted to fully embrace React, as it's likely I will be focusing on the React stack of technologies once I graduate from Turing. For this reason, I put forth efforts to learn various architectural setups within React/Redux. I also focused on complex Routes in my final personal project of the inning. Overall, I am satisfied with my engagement within the community and cohort, and feel proud of the projects completed this mod.
How could those groupthink situations have been avoided?
Trusting your instincts more than being influence by those around you
Bring in outsider opinion, knowing they haven’t been influenced by those already in the group
Analyzing the information you’re using to base decisions on - to make sure your data is valid
Run through all possible scenarios in order to consider the risk of majority decision
Could the tools listed in the article have prevented that situation?
The leader(s) have to been accepting to the views of everyone
I think the stepladder technique would work well - continue to add outsiders to the group to express beliefs before they are influenced by other beliefs already popular within the group