I have moved this over to the Tech Interview Cheat Sheet Repo and has been expanded and even has code challenges you can run and practice against!
\
<!DOCTYPE html> | |
<html> | |
<head> | |
<meta charset="utf-8"> | |
<title>Building a router</title> | |
<script> | |
// Put John's template engine code here... | |
(function () { | |
// A hash to store our routes: |
- Haskell Mergesort | |
- Copyright (C) 2014 by Kendall Stewart | |
First we define a couple of helper functions that | |
will be useful in splitting the list in half: | |
> fsthalf :: [a] -> [a] | |
> fsthalf xs = take (length xs `div` 2) xs |
/* ******************************************************************************************* | |
* THE UPDATED VERSION IS AVAILABLE AT | |
* https://github.com/LeCoupa/awesome-cheatsheets | |
* ******************************************************************************************* */ | |
// 0. Synopsis. | |
// http://nodejs.org/api/synopsis.html |
(by @andrestaltz)
If you prefer to watch video tutorials with live-coding, then check out this series I recorded with the same contents as in this article: Egghead.io - Introduction to Reactive Programming.
Sure, Github wins on the UI. Hands down. But, despite my initial annoyance with Gerrit when I first started using it almost a year ago, I am now a convert. Fully. Let me tell you why.
Note: This is an opinionated (on purpose) piece. I assume your preferences are like mine on certain ideas, such as:
- Fast-forward submits to the target branch are better than allowing merge commits to the target branch. The reason I personally prefer this is that, even if a non-conflicting merge to the target branch is possible, the fact that the review/pull request is not up to date with the latest on the target branch means feature branch test suite runs in the CI pipeline reporting on the review/PR may not be accurate. Another minor point is that forced merge commits are annoying as fuck (opinion) and clutter up Git log histories unnecessarily and I prefer clean histories.
- Atomic/related changes all in one commit is something worth striving for. Having your dev
#!/usr/bin/env bash | |
# Colours picked from https://robinpowered.com/blog/best-practice-system-for-organizing-and-tagging-github-issues/ | |
### | |
# Label definitions | |
### | |
declare -A LABELS | |
# Platform |
NOTE: This guide has moved to https://github.com/bpierre/switch-to-vim-for-good
This guide is coming from an email I used to send to newcomers to Vim. It is not intended to be a complete guide, it is about how I switched myself.
My decision to switch to Vim has been made a long time ago. Coming from TextMate 1, I wanted to learn an editor that is Open Source (so I don’t lose my time learning a tool that can be killed), cross platform (so I can use it everywhere), and powerful enough (so I won’t regret TextMate). For these reasons, Vim has always been the editor I wanted to learn, but it took me several years before I did it in a way that works for me. I tried to switch progressively, using the Janus Vim distribution for a few months, then got back to using TextMate 2 for a time, waiting for the next attempt… here is what finally worked for me.
Original gist with comments: https://gist.github.com/bpierre/0a0025d348b6001394e0