You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This write-up formalizes a modest adaptation to the regular Schnorr and ECDSA signature scheme, using existing techniques, that allows for signature verification without requiring the message.
The regular signature scheme enables two functions:
This post describes a fully decentralized two-way peg sidechain design. Activating new sidechains requires a soft fork, hence the name softchains. The key aspect is that all softchains are validated by everyone via Proof-of-Work Fraud Proofs (PoW FP) -- a slow but very efficient consensus mechanism that only requires the validation of disputed blocks. This does increase the validation burden of mainchain full nodes, but only by a minimal amount (~100MB per chain per year). It's similar to [drivechains][0], but without the major downside of having to rely on miners, since all Bitcoin full node users can efficiently validate each sidechain.
Proof-of-Work Fraud Proofs
Last year I posted the idea of [PoW FP to the Bitcoin mailing list][1] ([follow-up here][2]). The idea is that we can use the existence of a fork in Bitc
This is a variation of the Hodl Hodl contract design for Liquid, but without an arbitrator (not counting Liquid itself). It's pretty simple and similar ideas exist, but it seemed interesting enough to write up and spur some conversation.
I'll begin by explaining the high level concept. For the full details, please examine the steps in the diagram below.
Concept
A contract where the Borrower puts up 1.5x collateral (e.g. 1.5 L-BTC) in order to borrow another asset (e.g. $10k USDT, if we assume that's the price of 1 L-BTC). The borrower can reclaim the collateral if they pay back the loan before expiry. If expiry is reached, the collateral goes to the Lender.
Works today with [single signer ECDSA adaptor signatures][0], or with Schnorr + MuSig.
Other than the explanation below, there's also a diagram and a video.
Advantages:
Requires merely two on-chain transactions for successful completion, as opposed to four
Scriptless, and one of the chains doesn't need to support timelocks
Can be used for efficient privacy swaps, e.g. [Payswap][1]
I'm co-founder/director of the 2140 Foundation together with Josie. We're a stable and independent European hub for Bitcoin development with a physical office in Amsterdam, focused on increasing developer satisfaction, growth, and productivity.
Blind Merged Mining (BMM) is the idea of committing the hash of another blockchain into a unique location on the Bitcoin blockchain, and paying a Bitcoin fee to miners for the privilege of deciding this hash and capturing the fees inside the other blockchain. Since miners don’t have to know what the hash represents and are simply incentivized to choose the highest bidder, it requires no extra validation on their part (“blind”). This idea was originally conceived of by Paul Sztorc, but required a specific soft fork. [0]
In essence, BMM is a mechanism that allows external blockchains (altcoins, tokens) to outsource their mining to the Bitcoin blockchain. Instead of burning electricity with ASICs, th