A quick comparison/ benchmark between Hogan, Dust, doT and underscore
Developed by Twitter (same team as Bootstrap), use exactly the same syntax as Mustache, but more performant and more stuff available server side.
My name is {{ name }}
var externalObj = {key: 'value'}; | |
var items = { | |
obj: { | |
'string prop': 'string val', | |
5: 10, | |
nested: [[3, [5, 2]]], | |
'function': function(){return true;}, | |
reference: externalObj | |
}, |
#! /bin/bash | |
# build the environment | |
mkdir tessenv; cd tessenv | |
TROOT=`pwd` | |
mkdir $TROOT/stockfonts; mkdir $TROOT/build; mkdir $TROOT/build/eng | |
echo "Environment built" | |
# Get the stock english fonts from Google (old, but they work) | |
cd $TROOT/stockfonts | |
GET http://tesseract-ocr.googlecode.com/files/boxtiff-2.01.eng.tar.gz > boxtiff-2.01.eng.tar.gz |
A quick comparison/ benchmark between Hogan, Dust, doT and underscore
Developed by Twitter (same team as Bootstrap), use exactly the same syntax as Mustache, but more performant and more stuff available server side.
My name is {{ name }}
o.......Open files, directories and bookmarks....................|NERDTree-o|
go......Open selected file, but leave cursor in the NERDTree.....|NERDTree-go|
t.......Open selected node/bookmark in a new tab.................|NERDTree-t|
T.......Same as 't' but keep the focus on the current tab........|NERDTree-T|
i.......Open selected file in a split window.....................|NERDTree-i|
gi......Same as i, but leave the cursor on the NERDTree..........|NERDTree-gi|
s.......Open selected file in a new vsplit.......................|NERDTree-s|
gs......Same as s, but leave the cursor on the NERDTree..........|NERDTree-gs|
O.......Recursively open the selected directory..................|NERDTree-O|
function mapValues(obj, fn) { | |
return Object.keys(obj).reduce((result, key) => { | |
result[key] = fn(obj[key], key); | |
return result; | |
}, {}); | |
} | |
function pick(obj, fn) { | |
return Object.keys(obj).reduce((result, key) => { | |
if (fn(obj[key])) { |
There are a lot of ways to serve a Go HTTP application. The best choices depend on each use case. Currently nginx looks to be the standard web server for every new project even though there are other great web servers as well. However, how much is the overhead of serving a Go application behind an nginx server? Do we need some nginx features (vhosts, load balancing, cache, etc) or can you serve directly from Go? If you need nginx, what is the fastest connection mechanism? This are the kind of questions I'm intended to answer here. The purpose of this benchmark is not to tell that Go is faster or slower than nginx. That would be stupid.
So, these are the different settings we are going to compare:
# | |
# https://www.owasp.org/index.php/XSS_Filter_Evasion_Cheat_Sheet | |
# based on the RSnake original http://ha.ckers.org/xss.html | |
# Retrieved on 2013-11-20 | |
# Much of this wildly obsolete | |
# | |
# XSS Locator 2 | |
'';!--"<XSS>=&{()} |
var parser = document.createElement('a'); | |
parser.href = "http://example.com:3000/pathname/?search=test#hash"; | |
parser.protocol; // => "http:" | |
parser.hostname; // => "example.com" | |
parser.port; // => "3000" | |
parser.pathname; // => "/pathname/" | |
parser.search; // => "?search=test" | |
parser.hash; // => "#hash" | |
parser.host; // => "example.com:3000" |
eval$x=%q(eval(%w(s="]k<<k7@k9 | |
9k@,7&]-7k.@61y?c<c@9k.?isu:,e | |
y<?2k_i]61 o@3i>k@_]9_g36o1@ | |
i4k?w/r?1o ?i=i?yoy65kok95 | |
qw6?ci_:<ye g'=ok?;g'n/g?o | |
i2?.(]{8{)- u8c@4>]u8c-u@ | |
gq7?@4]0;g? ;|g|;]*qkbk0e | |
g,_@eqqeqqg @>'] a<<0e4e5 | |
oi{25>|>?@ c8 &7*3986 | |
@a;;0+>*@2 _i m{@{+_( |
[Unit] | |
Description=High-performance, schema-free document-oriented database | |
Documentation=man:mongod(1) | |
After=network.target | |
[Service] | |
Type=forking | |
User=mongodb | |
Group=mongodb |