https://github.com/RDFLib/pyLODE
RDFLib/pyLODE#108 : better support for SDO constructs
wget https://schema.org/version/latest/schemaorg-current-http.ttl
# https://github.com/schemaorg/schemaorg/issues/2831 : add owl:Ontology and rdfs:isDefinedBy
diff -bu0 schemaorg-current-http.ttl schema-with-added-ontology.ttl > schema-add-ontology.diff
pip install pylode
time pylode -i schema-with-added-ontology.ttl -c true -o schema.html
| @prefix dc: <http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/> . | |
| @prefix dct: <http://purl.org/dc/terms/> . | |
| @prefix fn: <http://www.w3.org/2005/xpath-functions#> . | |
| @prefix foaf: <http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/> . | |
| @prefix gleif-L1: <https://www.gleif.org/ontology/L1/> . | |
| @prefix gleif-L2: <https://www.gleif.org/ontology/L2/> . | |
| @prefix gleif-base: <https://www.gleif.org/ontology/Base/> . | |
| @prefix gleif-data-L1: <https://linked.opendata.gleif.org/L1/> . | |
| @prefix gleif-data-L2: <https://linked.opendata.gleif.org/L2/> . | |
| @prefix gleif-data-ra: <https://linked.opendata.gleif.org/RegistrationAuthority/> . |
https://twitter.com/valexiev1/status/1215218714049699841: Compare #rdfpuml #RDF #visualization to more generic viz at http://rdfshape.weso.es/dataVisualize using #CytoScape or a generic #graphviz dot layout.
Guess which one is usable by a data designer!
| #!/bin/sh | |
| gunzip -c viaf-20191104-links.txt.gz | perl viaf-links-count.pl > viaf-links-count-201911.txt |
From the discussion https://forum.plantuml.net/4147, this is an example of a sequence diagram rendered as Unicode AsciiArt, limited to 78 chars, for embedding into an IETF RFC.
puml -tutxt sequence-asciiArt.puml
I can't believe how usable the ascii version is! See png version at https://i.imgur.com/zGFzsrI.png
| { | |
| "url": "@id", | |
| "type": "@type", | |
| "value": "@value", | |
| "lang": "@language", | |
| "data": "@graph", | |
| "extensions" : "@nest", | |
| "label": "http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label" | |
| } |
This describes datasets for scientific topic classification. The list was developed as part of work on the project Tracking of Research Results for EC DG RTD.
MAG fields of study (FOS): developed using artificial intelligence and semantic understanding of content.
RDF datasets can be serialized in many different forms, complicating comparison of test results. Many of the negative (partial/fail) results on http://sparqlscore.com can be improved if the comparator is more flexible. Several of the issues at https://github.com/BorderCloud/TFT-tests/issues are related to this problem.
Some examples of equivalences:
"foo" is the same as "foo"^^xsd:string
| #!perl -n | |
| # zcat OpenPermID-bulk-organization-20180729_132845.ttl.gz | perl permid-fix-url.pl - | gzip - > organization.ttl.gz | |
| # fix permid organization.ttl URLs to avoid: https://jira.ontotext.com/browse/GDB-2798 | |
| m{<https://\?\?} and next; # skip line with ????, pray and hope this won't break turtle | |
| s{ # various malformed variants of http: | |
| http://htpp:// | | |
| http://http:// | |
| echo -e "\n$1" | |
| grep -Fl "$1" */*.json |