<Additional information about your API call. Try to use verbs that match both request type (fetching vs modifying) and plurality (one vs multiple).>
-
URL
<The URL Structure (path only, no root url)>
-
Method:
(by @andrestaltz)
If you prefer to watch video tutorials with live-coding, then check out this series I recorded with the same contents as in this article: Egghead.io - Introduction to Reactive Programming.
| #!/bin/bash | |
| PROJECT_NAME=MyApp | |
| SCHEME_NAME=MyApp | |
| STARTTIME=$(date +%s); | |
| set -e | |
| set -x | |
| ### Install dependencies | |
| echo "--- Install dependencies [Time Elapsed $(($(date +%s) - $STARTTIME))s]" |
| # Create a container from the mongo image, | |
| # run is as a daemon (-d), expose the port 27017 (-p), | |
| # set it to auto start (--restart) | |
| # and with mongo authentication (--auth) | |
| # Image used is https://hub.docker.com/_/mongo/ | |
| docker pull mongo | |
| docker run --name YOURCONTAINERNAME --restart=always -d -p 27017:27017 mongo mongod --auth | |
| # Using the mongo "localhost exception" (https://docs.mongodb.org/v3.0/core/security-users/#localhost-exception) | |
| # add a root user |
Short (72 chars or less) summary
More detailed explanatory text. Wrap it to 72 characters. The blank
line separating the summary from the body is critical (unless you omit
the body entirely).
Write your commit message in the imperative: "Fix bug" and not "Fixed
bug" or "Fixes bug." This convention matches up with commit messages
| const http2 = require('http2'); | |
| const fs = require('fs'); | |
| const path = require('path'); | |
| const zlib = require('zlib'); | |
| const brotli = require('brotli'); // npm package | |
| const PORT = 3032; | |
| const BROTLI_QUALITY = 11; // slow, but we're caching so who cares | |
| const STATIC_DIRECTORY = path.resolve(__dirname, '../dist/'); | |
| const cache = {}; |
This plugin adds completion for the Kubernetes cluster manager, as well as some aliases for common kubectl commands.
To use it, add kubectl to the plugins array in your zshrc file:
plugins=(... kubectl)This is definitely not the first time I've written about this topic, but I haven't written formally about it in quite awhile. So I want to revisit why I think technical-position interviewing is so poorly designed, and lay out what I think would be a better process.
I'm just one guy, with a bunch of strong opinions and a bunch of flaws. So take these suggestions with a grain of salt. I'm sure there's a lot of talented, passionate folks with other thoughts, and some are probably a lot more interesting and useful than my own.
But at the same time, I hope you'll set aside the assumptions and status quo of how interviewing is always done. Just because you were hired a certain way, and even if you liked it, doesn't mean that it's a good interview process to repeat.
If you're happy with the way technical interviewing currently works at your company, fine. Just stop, don't read any further. I'm not going to spend any effort trying to convince you otherwise.