git clone [email protected]:YOUR-USERNAME/YOUR-FORKED-REPO.git
cd into/cloned/fork-repo
git remote add upstream git://github.com/ORIGINAL-DEV-USERNAME/REPO-YOU-FORKED-FROM.git
git fetch upstream
git clone [email protected]:YOUR-USERNAME/YOUR-FORKED-REPO.git
cd into/cloned/fork-repo
git remote add upstream git://github.com/ORIGINAL-DEV-USERNAME/REPO-YOU-FORKED-FROM.git
git fetch upstream
sudo apt-get install unzip; | |
wget -O /tmp/chromedriver.zip http://chromedriver.googlecode.com/files/chromedriver_linux64_19.0.1068.0.zip && sudo unzip /tmp/chromedriver.zip chromedriver -d /usr/local/bin/; |
require('font-awesome/css/font-awesome.css'); | |
document.body.innerHTML = '<i class="fa fa-fw fa-question"></i>'; |
Go to the egghead website, i.e. Building a React.js App
run
$.each($('h4 a'), function(index, video){
console.log(video.href);
});
JD Maturen, 2016/07/05, San Francisco, CA
As has been much discussed, stock options as used today are not a practical or reliable way of compensating employees of fast growing startups. With an often high strike price, a large tax burden on execution due to AMT, and a 90 day execution window after leaving the company many share options are left unexecuted.
There have been a variety of proposed modifications to how equity is distributed to address these issues for individual employees. However, there hasn't been much discussion of how these modifications will change overall ownership dynamics of startups. In this post we'll dive into the situation as it stands today where there is very near 100% equity loss when employees leave companies pre-exit and then we'll look at what would happen if there were instead a 0% loss rate.
What we'll see is that employees gain nearly 3-fold, while both founders and investors – particularly early investors – get dilute