anta40

import android.content.AsyncTaskLoader;
import android.content.Context;
import android.util.Log;

public class BigDataLoader extends AsyncTaskLoader<BigData> {

    public BigDataLoader(Context context) {
        super(context);
        Log.d("test", "...BigDataLoader.");
    }

anta40

import android.util.Log;

import java.util.ArrayList;
import java.util.Random;

public class BigData {
    static int msDataIndex = 0;

    int mDataIndex = 0;
    String mDataName = "";

anta40

{
	"data": [{
			"tanggal": "2022-09-17",
			"detail": [{
					"id": 1,
					"saving_id": 1
				},
				{
					"id": 2,
					"saving_id": 2

anta40

package com.anta40.webviewtest;

import androidx.appcompat.app.AppCompatActivity;
import androidx.swiperefreshlayout.widget.SwipeRefreshLayout;

import android.os.Bundle;
import android.webkit.WebSettings;
import android.webkit.WebView;
import android.webkit.WebViewClient;

anta40

environment:
  sdk: ">=2.12.0 <3.0.0"
  flutter: ">=1.17.0"

dependencies:
  cupertino_icons: ^1.0.2
  custom_radio_grouped_button: ^2.0.0
  dart_nats: ^0.3.5
  dash_chat: ^1.1.16
  flutter:

anta40

import java.util.Scanner;
class gaji{
	public static void main(String[] args) {
		  String nik, nama;
		 int gol;
		 float arr[][] = {
		  {1.0f, 1500000.0f, 0.1f, 10.0f},
		  {2.0f, 2500000.0f, 0.5f, 15.0f},
		  {3.0f, 3500000.0f, 0.7f, 15.0f},
		  {4.0f, 5500000.0f, 1.0f, 20.0f}

anta40

{
	draw: 1,
	recordsTotal: 2,
	recordsFiltered: 2,
	data: [
	{
		date_cron: "20210318",
		created_at: "2021-03-18 17:08:31",
		updated_at: "2021-03-18 17:08:31"
		detail_1: "aaaaa"

anta40

// Tested only on MacOS
#include <GLUT/glut.h>
#include <stdio.h>
float xt=1.0,yt=1.0;            // For interactive Keyboard
float x = 1.0,y = 1.0,z=1.0;    // For Movement
float angle =0;  				// For Function animation
float Autorun = 300;			// For Movement Autorun

void animation(void)
{

anta40

Foreward

This document was originally written several years ago. At the time I was working as an execution core verification engineer at Arm. The following points are coloured heavily by working in and around the execution cores of various processors. Apply a pinch of salt; points contain varying degrees of opinion.

It is still my opinion that RISC-V could be much better designed; though I will also say that if I was building a 32 or 64-bit CPU today I'd likely implement the architecture to benefit from the existing tooling.

Mostly based upon the RISC-V ISA spec v2.0. Some updates have been made for v2.2

Original Foreword: Some Opinion

The RISC-V ISA has pursued minimalism to a fault. There is a large emphasis on minimizing instruction count, normalizing encoding, etc. This pursuit of minimalism has resulted in false orthogonalities (such as reusing the same instruction for branches, calls and returns) and a requirement for superfluous instructions which impacts code density both in terms of size and

anta40

<?php 

    /* 
    Curl command:
    curl -X GET --header "Accept: application/json" --header "user-key: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" "https://developers.zomato.com/api/v2.1/search?entity_id=74&q=seafood"
    */

    ini_set('display_errors', 1);
    ini_set('display_startup_errors', 1);
    error_reporting(E_ALL);