If you want to get more information, I suggest you browse raspberry-pi-pcie-devices and its issue.
Use cases
| CM4 IO Board(Official) | CM4-IO-BASE-A(Waveshare) |
| [package] | |
| name = "itertest" | |
| version = "0.1.0" | |
| edition = "2021" | |
| [dependencies] | |
| futures = "0.3.28" | |
| pyo3 = "0.19.2" | |
| pyo3-asyncio = { version = "0.19.0", features = ["tokio-runtime"] } | |
| tokio = { version = "1.32.0", features = ["sync"] } |
| import 'dart:ffi'; | |
| import 'dart:isolate'; | |
| import 'dart:io'; | |
| import 'package:ffi/ffi.dart'; | |
| void newIsolate(SendPort sendPort) { | |
| final ptr = calloc.allocate<Int>(100); | |
| ptr[0] = 42; | |
| sendPort.send(ptr.address); | |
| sleep(const Duration(seconds: 1)); |
If you want to get more information, I suggest you browse raspberry-pi-pcie-devices and its issue.
Use cases
| CM4 IO Board(Official) | CM4-IO-BASE-A(Waveshare) |
Personal notes building zig 0.15.0-dev.xxxx on Macbook M3 Max
20250731 Sequoia 15.6, latest XCode Commandline Tools, homebrew-installed LLVM 20.1.8 (llvm@20)
This way of building probably works on all Apple Silicon Macs, but you must check other models yourself. I keep a list of some successful M3 Max builds here
Some Intel Macs should also work (default homebrew path is the only significant difference). But I don't test that anymore.
I'm sorry to tell you, but group is gone.
If you check out the latest k.d on shakti.com as at 28 March 2023, you'll see that 'unary' = is now 'freq' (frequency).
Group had a long life: it's been around since at least k2, or 1996.
So why did group go? And what should we use instead?
Audience: I assume you heard of chatGPT, maybe played with it a little, and was imressed by it (or tried very hard not to be). And that you also heard that it is "a large language model". And maybe that it "solved natural language understanding". Here is a short personal perspective of my thoughts of this (and similar) models, and where we stand with respect to language understanding.
Around 2014-2017, right within the rise of neural-network based methods for NLP, I was giving a semi-academic-semi-popsci lecture, revolving around the story that achieving perfect language modeling is equivalent to being as intelligent as a human. Somewhere around the same time I was also asked in an academic panel "what would you do if you were given infinite compute and no need to worry about labour costs" to which I cockily responded "I would train a really huge language model, just to show that it doesn't solve everything!". We
...and obviously we're building a workaround. But I'm absolutely flabbergasted that a standard <input type="date"> HTML field, in a standard browser, from a company that bases its reputation good design, could be so dreadful.
I'm the developer for a startup that sells a genetic test to recommend medications for high blood pressure. For medical reasons we need to know our customers' birth date. Most of our customers are in their 60s or older. We've found that many of them use iPads or iPhones. And they're the ones who complain to our customer support that our site is unusable.
For fun, I had ChatGPT take the free response section of the 2022 AP Computer Science A exam. (The exam also has a multiple-choice section, but the College Board doesn't publish this.) It scored 32/36.