Juerd

RFC: A more Perl6-esque "unpack"
================================

This is an idea for an "unpack" replacement. The basic reasoning behind it, is
that number encodings and string encodings needn't be treated all that
differently. Instead of passing the name of a string encoding, you can pass
a native type object. When decoding things of determinable lengths, any number
of types can be given.

A variable length thing without a length indication can only be passed at the

Tomcc

  {
    "name": "fish.pufferfish.raw",
    "id": 206,
    "icon": "fish_raw_puffer_fish",
    "use_animation": "eat",
    "use_duration": 32,
    "max_damage": 0,
    "stacked_by_data": true,

    "food": {

mariusGundersen

Programmer Collective Nouns

• An Enumerable of Rubyists @raganwald
• An Indentation of Pythonistas @raganwald
• A fold of Haskellers! @ReinH
• A Din of Twitterers @raganwald
• A callback of JavaScripters @irvingreid
• An NCC-1701 of Java Programmers @raganwald
• A relation of SQLers @raganwald

egonSchiele

import Control.Monad.Reader

hello :: Reader String String
hello = do
    name <- ask
    return ("hello, " ++ name ++ "!")

bye :: Reader String String
bye = do
    name <- ask

dtakahas

class Babby < PragnentGirl::GetPragnent

  attr_accessible :name, :mother, :location, :pragnent_girl_id

  belongs_to :pragnent_girl
  
  before_save :destroy_instain_mothers
  after_save :pary_for_father
  
  #How is babby formed?