I hereby claim:
- I am carljm on github.
- I am carljm (https://keybase.io/carljm) on keybase.
- I have a public key whose fingerprint is 3C32 FA99 DC96 932C 2204 6A41 2D1F B791 6A52 E121
To claim this, I am signing this object:
| import json | |
| import requests | |
| from websocket import create_connection | |
| BASE = 'localhost:3000/socket.io/?EIO=3' | |
| # First establish a polling-transport HTTP connection to get a session ID | |
| url = 'http://%s&transport=polling' % BASE |
| $ ./tests/runtests.py migrations | |
| Testing against Django installed in '/home/carljm/projects/django/django/django/django' | |
| Creating test database for alias 'default'... | |
| Creating test database for alias 'other'... | |
| ..................................................................................................................................s...............................EE.EE.E..........s....................................... | |
| ====================================================================== | |
| ERROR: test_squashmigrations_squashes (migrations.test_commands.SquashMigrationsTest) | |
| ---------------------------------------------------------------------- | |
| Traceback (most recent call last): | |
| File "/home/carljm/projects/django/django/django/django/test/utils.py", line 187, in inner |
| class Greatest(object): | |
| """A pseudo- (or meta-) aggregate; returns highest of sub-aggregates. | |
| This has to be inserted directly into the Query internals; it can't go | |
| through the usual ``qs.annotate(...)`` or ``qs.aggregate(...)`` path | |
| (because that leads to ``Query.add_aggregate(...)`` which makes assumptions | |
| we can't meet). | |
| To use, instantiate ``Greatest`` with one or more normal aggregates, and | |
| call ``greatest_instance.add_to_qs(queryset, 'name')`` |
| """ | |
| SQLAlchemy, PostgreSQL (psycopg2), and autocommit | |
| See blog post: http://oddbird.net/2014/06/14/sqlalchemy-postgres-autocommit/ | |
| """ | |
| from contextlib import contextmanager | |
| from sqlalchemy import create_engine, event | |
| from sqlalchemy.orm import sessionmaker, Session as BaseSession |
| diff --git a/tox.ini b/tox.ini | |
| --- a/tox.ini | |
| +++ b/tox.ini | |
| @@ -1,7 +1,9 @@ | |
| [tox] | |
| envlist= | |
| py26-1.3,py26-1.4,py26-1.5,py26-1.6, | |
| - py27-1.3,py27-1.4,py27-1.5,py27-1.6,py27-1.7,py27-master | |
| + py27-1.3,py27-1.4,py27-1.5,py27-1.6,py27-1.7,py27-master, | |
| + py33-1.5,py33-1.6,py33-1.7,py33-master, |
I hereby claim:
To claim this, I am signing this object:
| $ curl -s -XGET 'http://localhost:9200/_settings?pretty' | |
| { | |
| "jlor" : { | |
| "settings" : { | |
| "index.analysis.analyzer.default.filter.1" : "lowercase", | |
| "index.analysis.analyzer.default.filter.0" : "standard", | |
| "index.analysis.analyzer.default.tokenizer" : "standard", | |
| "index.analysis.analyzer.default.type" : "custom", | |
| "index.number_of_shards" : "5", | |
| "index.number_of_replicas" : "1", |
| export GEM_HOME=$VIRTUAL_ENV/rubygems | |
| export GEM_PATH= | |
| export PATH=$VIRTUAL_ENV/rubygems/bin:$PATH |
| diff --git a/docs/ref/forms/models.txt b/docs/ref/forms/models.txt | |
| index 46f7df1..dd0a422 100644 | |
| --- a/docs/ref/forms/models.txt | |
| +++ b/docs/ref/forms/models.txt | |
| @@ -33,8 +33,8 @@ Model Form Functions | |
| ``formfield_callback`` and ``widgets`` are all passed through to | |
| :func:`~django.forms.models.modelform_factory`. | |
| - Arguments ``formset``, ``extra``, ``max_num``, ``can_order``, and | |
| - ``can_delete`` are passed through to |
| It seems to me that there's a remarkable level of consensus developing | |
| here (though it may not look like it), and a small set of remaining open | |
| questions. | |
| The consensus (as I see it): | |
| - Migrate away from scraping external HTML pages, with package owners in | |
| control of the migration but a deadline for a forced switch, as outlined | |
| in Holger's PEP (with all appropriate caution and testing). |