| import sys | |
| import random | |
| u_Health = 10 | |
| t_Health = 10 | |
| while u_Health*t_Health > 0: | |
| they_attack=random.randint(0,1) | |
| if they_attack == 0: | |
| print ("they attack!") | |
| u_Health=u_Health-1 | |
| #print (u_Health,t_Health) |
| %%% parameters | |
| % forget what you know | |
| clear | |
| % set max N | |
| N=500; | |
| % set "turnover n", aka n0 | |
| n0=10; | |
| % plotting parameters: | |
| zmax=.2; | |
| xmax=60; |
| %%% little code to compute steady state "q" from creation+decay "wp,wm" | |
| % wp=creation | |
| % wm=destruction | |
| function q=qdef(wp,wm); | |
| % 1) most important line p=\Pi (wp_j/wm_{j+1})=S^+_n/S^-/n | |
| p=cumprod( wp(1:(end-1)) ... | |
| ./ ... | |
| wm((1+1):end) ... | |
| ); |
2007: next-generation sequencing.
2008:
With its tremendous potential for understanding cellular biology now poised to become a reality, super-resolution fluorescence microscopy is our choice for Method of the Year.
2009:
Nature Methods' Method of the Year 2009 goes to induced pluripotency for its potential for biological discovery.
2010:
With the capacity to control cellular behaviors using light and genetically encoded light-sensitive proteins, optogenetics has opened new doors for experimentation across biological fields.
how to write a paper (one possible answer)
Originally appeared on nature NYC blog: http://blogs.nature.com/nyc/2011/08/10/how-to-write-a-paper-one-possible-answer
10 Aug 2011 | 19:11 EDT | Posted by chris wiggins | Category: Uncategorized
how to write a paper
a student recently asked me how to write a paper. here’s an algorithm i’d suggest, with plenty of room for an individual to deviate.
| Finally posting my 389-page tutorial | |
| "data science @ the new york times" | |
| from last week's Machine Learning Summer School | |
| in Arequipa, Peru ( http://mlss.cc/ ) | |
| here: http://www.slideshare.net/chrishwiggins/machine-learning-summer-school-2016 | |
| Topics include: | |
| descriptive/predictive/prescriptive modeling | |
| (unsupervised/supervised/reinforcement learning), |
| ( advice from @johnmyleswhite; ministorm starts with https://twitter.com/johnmyleswhite/status/766657182582513666 ) | |
| I keep planning on writing a post about contributing to OSS effectively, but I'm starting to doubt I ever will. So here's some tweets. | |
| (1) Credibility is everything. People are busy, so they heavily use personal trust to inform their decisions. You must become credible. | |
| (2) Credibility starts with technical competence, rather than shared aesthetics. Do *not* start contributing by engaging in design debates. | |
| (3) Instead, work on simple projects where success or failure will be clear. Write unit tests. Write docs. Improve a function's performance. | |
| (4) That kind of work will allow you to demonstrate skill, which will make you credible. After, people will want to hear your design goals. | |
| (5) Don't engage in debates that are long-standing without being familiar with the entire past history of the debate. | |
| (6) Especially don't focus on the shallow part of a debate where you can participate without kno |
| % thoughts on deep, 2016-09-01 | |
| % @chrishwiggins | |
| (apologies this ended up being long; most of the ideas are in 1 graphic image, | |
| so feel free to just click on the link | |
| ( https://sketch.io/render/sk-e40f367014c9440fef81de46271b4395.jpeg ) | |
| and you'll get the main ideas in about 1-2 seconds, and can save | |
| the text for sometime when you're stuck in an elevator) | |
| I was thinking about how deep learning as a capability relates to a company's challenges. |
( please email chris.wiggins@gmail.com with questions, comments, or suggestions )
- aux: auxiliary files, facts and useful things meant for human eyes
- dat: data, not for human eyes
- doc: things you edit for humans to read
- eml: emails sent and received
- fig: figures
- git: git or GitHub repos