Attention: the list was moved to
https://github.com/dypsilon/frontend-dev-bookmarks
This page is not maintained anymore, please update your bookmarks.
// Start `node d3-server.js` | |
// Then visit http://localhost:1337/ | |
// | |
var d3 = require('d3'), | |
http = require('http') | |
http.createServer(function (req, res) { | |
// Chrome automatically sends a requests for favicons | |
// Looks like https://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=39402 isn't | |
// fixed or this is a regression. |
Attention: the list was moved to
https://github.com/dypsilon/frontend-dev-bookmarks
This page is not maintained anymore, please update your bookmarks.
Since this is on Hacker News and reddit...
_t
in my types. I spend a lot of time at a level where I can do that; "reserved for system libraries? I am the system libraries".char *
s.type * name
, however, is entirely intentional.This is a post by Joel Spolsky. The original post is linked at the bottom.
This is such a common question here and elsewhere that I will attempt to write the world's most canonical answer to this question. Hopefully in the future when someone on answers.onstartups asks how to split up the ownership of their new company, you can simply point to this answer.
The most important principle: Fairness, and the perception of fairness, is much more valuable than owning a large stake. Almost everything that can go wrong in a startup will go wrong, and one of the biggest things that can go wrong is huge, angry, shouting matches between the founders as to who worked harder, who owns more, whose idea was it anyway, etc. That is why I would always rather split a new company 50-50 with a friend than insist on owning 60% because "it was my idea," or because "I was more experienced" or anything else. Why? Because if I split the company 60-40, the company is going to fail when we argue ourselves to death. And if you ju