"paper name here", "John Smith",,,"Anonymous",,,"Jane Doe",,
Category,Rating (0-100),90% CI (0-100),Comments (footnote),Rating (0-100),"Confidence: *
High = 5,
Low = 0",Comments,Rating (0-100),90% CI (0-100),Comments
Overall assessment,50,"(40, 65)",,50,4,,79,59-94,
Advancing knowledge and practice,25,"(20,40)",,90,5,,90,70-100,
"Methods: Justification, reasonableness, validity, robustness",95,"(85,97.5)",,80,4,,70,50-90,
Logic & communication,75,"(60,90)",,80,4,,70,50-90,
"Open, collaborative, replicable",N/A,N/A,,90,3,,50,30-70,
"Engaging with real-world, impact quantification; practice, realism, and relevance",,,,,,,90,70-100,
Relevance to global priorities,60,"(40,75)",,95,3,,90,70-100,
"What ‘quality journal’ do you expect this work will be published in?
Note: 0= lowest/none, 5= highest/best",3,"(2.5,4.5)",,4,5,,5,High,
"On a ‘scale of journals’, what ‘quality of journal’ should this be published in?
Note: 0= lowest/none, 5= highest/best",3,"(2.5,4.5)",,4,5,,5,High,