Just tried to put this in a more readable format: https://github.com/svanderbleek/haskellandchill.com/blob/master/a-conversation-about-oop-vs-fp-turns-constructive.md
Person | Time | Message |
---|---|---|
sagar | 10:47 | why is that, why is OOP trash |
katychuang | 10:48 | excellent question |
katychuang | 10:49 | I've been told FP and OOP are different paradigms |
katychuang | 10:52 | I'm going to butcher a quote from a talk by Evie so I'm going to paraphrase… She said something like when you work with OOP you create lots of objects and rules on how they should interact and yet somehow end up having to touch each other a lot and inappropriately |
katychuang | 10:53 | On the other hand FP (especially Haskell) is like working with shapes, like that baby shape fitting toy where you focus more on fitting the type parameters correctly |
katychuang | 10:56 | I think of programming as building a piping system. FP (especia |