Dazza Greenwood dazzaji

PROMPT

Can you turn this into a markdown table? Or into CSV. Tell me if you’re unable to make sense of all the data presented.

OUTPUT (formatted)

I think congress and the new administration should craft a modern statutory prong of fair use explicitly tailored to AI training data access, focused specifically on models that provide free/open access tiers or are open source. This targeted approach recognizes that existing copyright frameworks, rooted in decades-old standards, fail to address a transformative technology that is critical to economic growth, societal advances, and the greater good. While these models use copyrighted works in their training, they do so in ways that are highly innovative and do not directly compete with the original works. The carve-out could be part of a broader "new deal on data" that pairs expanded fair use protection with new obligations around transparency and limited licensing requirements - creating a balanced framework that promotes continued advancement in this essential field while providing appropriate safeguards and accountability.

Interested to learn more and consider this? I asked OpenAI Deep Research to help

The following is a longer reply to a comment than LinkedIn will permit.

Thanks for asking! I wrote “nope” because I fundamentally reject the idea that having AI significantly smarter than humans automatically poses an inherent problem. In fact, I see it as an exciting opportunity.

Here’s why:

Tools Don’t Automatically Dull Our Minds: Historically, new technologies—like calculators—haven’t led to a wholesale decline in human intelligence. Instead, they shift how we use our cognitive resources. Rather than seeing AI as replacing human problem-solving, I view it as freeing us to explore more creative, strategic, or empathetic forms of thinking.

What is NotebookLM

NotebookLM gives you a personalized AI collaborator that helps you do your best thinking. After uploading your documents, NotebookLM becomes an instant expert in those sources so you can read, take notes, and collaborate with it to refine and organize your ideas.

NotebookLM is available to all users (18+) in the 180+ regions where the Gemini API is available in.

Asking questions

You can interact with your sources by writing questions or instructions into the chat box. Click the arrow or type the Enter key to send your question.

Things to try:

This gist is just me trying to better understand Ruv's idea for "Hypergraphs" as a way to do cool stuff with data (especially through generative AI and including for legal contexts). Here's more color on how Hypergraph's can be applied to contracts: https://gist.github.com/ruvnet/4dde5fcbaf13c88678e63ab75ff9bf78

In this gist there are three items, Section A, immediately below, is a hypothetical UCC Article 2 type contract for the sale of goods (a widget) between Alice (seller) and Bob (buyer) to explore the hypergraph's potential for capturing complex legal relationships and timelines. It is followed by Section B) Hypergraph Specification for Contract Between Alice and Bob, and Section C) Annotated Application of Hypergraph to the Contract.

A. Sale of Widget Agreement

This Sale of Goods Agreement ("Agreement") is made and entered into as of March 13, 2024, by and between Alice Ace ("Seller"), a legal entity specializing in manufacturing widgets, located at 1 Vericilious Lane, Berkington, CA 95678, a

	## MIT Individual Contributor License Agreement

	Thank you for your interest in contributing to open source software projects (“Projects”) made available by law.MIT.edu, other units of MIT or its affiliates (“MIT”). This Individual Contributor License Agreement (“Agreement”) sets out the terms governing any source code, object code, bug fixes, configuration changes, tools, specifications, documentation, data, materials, feedback, information or other works of authorship that you submit or have submitted, in any form and in any manner, to MIT in respect of any of the Projects (collectively “Contributions”). If you have any questions respecting this Agreement, please contact [email protected] or through the contact information at: https://tlo.mit.edu

	You agree that the following terms apply to all of your past, present and future Contributions. Except for the licenses granted in this Agreement, you retain all of your right, title and interest in and to your Contributions.

	Copyright License. You hereby grant, a

	- The judicial holding or decision of the court was to grant DNP's motion to dismiss the case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

	1. With respect to MK's allegations in Count I and II under the Lanham Act, MK alleged that DNP's false representations likely caused consumer confusion and direct diversion of clients or loss of goodwill. However, the court found these allegations insufficient to establish Article III standing. Specifically, the court noted that MK did not allege any facts to support that it lost actual revenue, incurred added expenses, lost any specific clients to DNP, or that clients considered withholding business from MK or were even aware of DNP. The court concluded these conclusory allegations did not demonstrate a concrete injury.

	2. For the injury to MK's reputation and goodwill alleged in Counts I and II, the court addressed this by finding MK provided no facts to support this claim. The court noted the complaint only referenced DNP's poor customer service reviews but did not alle