devinhalladay

#bg {
    -webkit-filter: blur(20px);
    -moz-filter: blur(20px);
    -o-filter: blur(20px);
    -ms-filter: blur(20px);
    filter: blur(20px);
    opacity: 0.4;
}

devinhalladay

$(document).ready(function() {
  window.location.hash = '';
  history.pushState('', document.title, window.location.pathname);
});

devinhalladay

> Sites
  > devinhalladay.com
    > .sass-cache # Sass caching to make compiling faster
    > […]
    > public
      > css
	- devin.css # My main stylesheet, compiled by Livereload
	- [*.css]
 

devinhalladay

Hello,

The Guild would like to acquire this username. First off, I will provide a quick example of this happening to someone else:

The Industry (@industry, http://theindustry.cc) acquired the username @industry without actually being impersonated. They merely had friends at Twitter and those friends gave them the inactive username (it was already in use, but the user hadn't Tweeted for some time). If you allow that for one company, that does not even own industry.com, how is it fair to not allow that treatment for The Guild?

Secondly, the account @guild, the one we are trying to acquire, has not been active since December 17th, 2012 — that's six (6) months and three (3) days (including today), which is a month and three days more than the suggested five months of inactivity required in order to have an account regarded as inactive.

Third, all of @guild's Tweets are spam. The English Tweets are all spam links and referral links. I have taken the liberty of translating the Japanese Tweets for you so you can