ericelliott

// instanceof is a prototype identity check.
// NOT a type check.

// That means it lies across execution contexts,
// when prototypes are dynamically reassigned,
// and when you throw confusing cases like this
// at it:

function foo() {}
const bar = { a: 'a'};

forabi

❯ rollup --version
rollup version 0.25.3

❯ time rollup -c ./rollup.js                      
rollup -c ./rollup.js  4.65s user 0.22s system 118% cpu 4.131 total

❯ time webpack                      
Hash: ebb00bbccd954c114d3c
Version: webpack 2.0.7-beta
Time: 3623ms

jamestalmage

Full Disclosure: I'm a member of the AVA team

Q: How much faster is AVA than Mocha (tap, tape, ...).

A: It depends.

First things first:

I should start by saying there are lots of reasons to choose AVA, and I don't think speed is (necessarily) the most import one. Other good reasons include:

ericelliott

// Composition Example

// http://codepen.io/ericelliott/pen/XXzadQ?editors=001
// https://gist.github.com/ericelliott/fed0fd7a0d3388b06402

const distortion = { distortion: 1 };
const volume = { volume: 1 };
const cabinet = { cabinet: 'maple' };
const lowCut = { lowCut: 1 };
const inputLevel = { inputLevel: 1 };

ericelliott

// Class Inheritance Example
// NOT RECOMMENDED. Use object composition, instead.

// https://gist.github.com/ericelliott/b668ce0ad1ab540df915
// http://codepen.io/ericelliott/pen/pgdPOb?editors=001

class GuitarAmp {
  constructor ({ cabinet = 'spruce', distortion = '1', volume = '0' } = {}) {
    Object.assign(this, {
      cabinet, distortion, volume

gaearon

function mapValues(obj, fn) {
  return Object.keys(obj).reduce((result, key) => {
    result[key] = fn(obj[key], key);
    return result;
  }, {});
}

function pick(obj, fn) {
  return Object.keys(obj).reduce((result, key) => {
    if (fn(obj[key])) {

dandelany

var RecursiveChildComponent = React.createClass({
  render() {
    return <div>
      {this.recursiveCloneChildren(this.props.children)}
    </div>
  },
  recursiveCloneChildren(children) {
    return React.Children.map(children, child => {
      if(!_.isObject(child)) return child;
      var childProps = {someNew: "propToAdd"};

ericelliott

let animal = {
  animalType: 'animal',
 
  describe () {
    return `An ${this.animalType} with ${this.furColor} fur, 
      ${this.legs} legs, and a ${this.tail} tail.`;
  }
};
 
let mouseFactory = function mouseFactory () {

ericelliott

let animal = {
  animalType: 'animal',
  
  describe () {
    return `An ${this.animalType}, with ${this.furColor} fur, 
      ${this.legs} legs, and a ${this.tail} tail.`;
  }
};

let mouse = Object.assign(Object.create(animal), {

msrose

Combining two git repositories

Use case: You have repository A with remote location rA, and repository B (which may or may not have remote location rB). You want to do one of two things:

• preserve all commits of both repositories, but replace everything from A with the contents of B, and use rA as your remote location
• actually combine the two repositories, as if they are two branches that you want to merge, using rA as the remote location

NB: Check out git subtree/git submodule and this Stack Overflow question before going through the steps below. This gist is just a record of how I solved this problem on my own one day.

Before starting, make sure your local and remote repositories are up-to-date with all changes you need. The following steps use the general idea of changing the remote origin and renaming the local master branch of one of the repos in order to combine the two master branches.