dschinkel

package com.kata.skunkworks

data class SkunkWork(val title: String)

dschinkel

import com.sun.xml.internal.xsom.impl.scd.Iterators;

import java.util.ArrayList;
import java.util.HashMap;

public class RomanNumeralCalculator {

    ArrayList<String> numeralOrder = new ArrayList<String>() {{
        add("I");
        add("V");

dschinkel

import com.fasterxml.jackson.jr.ob.JSON;

import java.util.Map;

import static spark.Spark.get;
import static spark.Spark.port;

public class FakeNumberServer {
    public static void main(String[] args) {
        port(2000);

dschinkel

/* 
  MUTABLE MAPS
  ------------
  Note: Its type is inferred by underlying values within
*/
val toRoman = mutableMapOf(
  "IIIII" to "V",
  "VV" to "X"
)

dschinkel

/*
  Note: 
  Uses superagent and mocha assertions.  
  This is how I do these tests nowdays, without supertest, just plain superagent.
*/

import request from 'superagent'

  it('returns a list of participants', async () => {
      const url = 'https://someurl';

dschinkel

package roman.numeral.calculator.kotlin

class Calculator {
    private val toRoman = mapOf(
        "IIIII" to "V",
        "VV" to "X",
        "XXXXX" to "L",
        "LL" to "C",
        "CCCCC" to "D",
        "DD" to "M"

dschinkel

package roman.numeral.calculator.kotlin

class Calculator {

    private val toRoman = mapOf(
        "IIIII" to "V",
        "VV" to "X",
        "XXXXX" to "L",
        "LL" to "C",
        "CCCCC" to "D",

dschinkel

const gulp = require('gulp'),
  less = require('gulp-less'),
  babel = require("gulp-babel"),
  shell = require('gulp-shell'),
  mocha = require('gulp-mocha'),
  rename = require('gulp-rename'),
  bro = require('gulp-bro'),
  del = require('del'),
  { series, dest, src } = require('gulp');

dschinkel

/* 
  Dave Schinkel's Notes after he wrote this test: 
  
        This is a test I wrote headlessly with Roboelectric around an existing Legacy codebase that's a mess. 
        We want to get some sort of confidence with an integration test which is what this test gave us for a 
        certain part of this codebase.
        
        This test indirectly tests behavior further down by 
        checking what I ultimately expected to be rendered
        

dschinkel

#define _CRT_SECURE_NO_WARNINGS
#include <stdio.h>
#define NUMBER_OF_DAYS 3
// Put your code below:
int main(void)
{
    int k, highEntry, lowEntry;
    printf("-- -= == IPC Temperature Analyzer == = --\n");
 
    for (int i = 1; i < NUMBER_OF_DAYS; i++)