One Paragraph of project description goes here
These instructions will get you a copy of the project up and running on your local machine for development and testing purposes. See deployment for notes on how to deploy the project on a live system.
The standard way of understanding the HTTP protocol is via the request reply pattern. Each HTTP transaction consists of a finitely bounded HTTP request and a finitely bounded HTTP response.
However it's also possible for both parts of an HTTP 1.1 transaction to stream their possibly infinitely bounded data. The advantages is that the sender can send data that is beyond the sender's memory limit, and the receiver can act on
I've been asked a few times over the last few months to put together a full write-up of the Git workflow we use at RichRelevance (and at Precog before), since I have referenced it in passing quite a few times in tweets and in person. The workflow is appreciably different from GitFlow and its derivatives, and thus it brings with it a different set of tradeoffs and optimizations. To that end, it would probably be helpful to go over exactly what workflow benefits I find to be beneficial or even necessary.
This is a post by Joel Spolsky, originally posted on answers.onstartups.com in response to a question. You can find a copy here.
This is such a common question here and elsewhere that I will attempt to write the world's most canonical answer to this question. Hopefully in the future when someone on answers.onstartups asks how to split up the ownership of their new company, you can simply point to this answer.
The most important principle: Fairness, and the perception of fairness, is much more valuable than owning a large stake. Almost everything that can go wrong in a startup will go wrong, and one of the biggest things that can go wrong is huge, angry, shouting matches between the founders as to who worked harder, who owns more, whose idea
I've been looking for the best Linux backup system, and also reading lots of HN comments.
Instead of putting pros and cons of every backup system I'll just list some deal-breakers which would disqualify them.
Also I would like that you, the HN community, would add more deal breakers for these or other backup systems if you know some more and at the same time, if you have data to disprove some of the deal-breakers listed here (benchmarks, info about something being true for older releases but is fixed on newer releases), please share it so that I can edit this list accordingly.
by alexander white ©
| #!/bin/bash | |
| PHANTOM_JS="phantomjs-1.9.8-linux-x86_64" | |
| if [[ $EUID -ne 0 ]]; then | |
| echo "You must be a root user" 2>&1 | |
| exit 1 | |
| else | |
| apt-get update | |
| apt-get install -y build-essential chrpath libssl-dev libxft-dev | |
| apt-get install -y libfreetype6 libfreetype6-dev | |
| apt-get install -y libfontconfig1 libfontconfig1-dev |
| Below are the Big O performance of common functions of different Java Collections. | |
| List | Add | Remove | Get | Contains | Next | Data Structure | |
| ---------------------|------|--------|------|----------|------|--------------- | |
| ArrayList | O(1) | O(n) | O(1) | O(n) | O(1) | Array | |
| LinkedList | O(1) | O(1) | O(n) | O(n) | O(1) | Linked List | |
| CopyOnWriteArrayList | O(n) | O(n) | O(1) | O(n) | O(1) | Array | |
| /* | |
| ******************************************************************************** | |
| Golang - Asterisk and Ampersand Cheatsheet | |
| ******************************************************************************** | |
| Also available at: https://play.golang.org/p/lNpnS9j1ma | |
| Allowed: | |
| -------- | |
| p := Person{"Steve", 28} stores the value |