| <?php | |
| /** | |
| * Converting BRL to BTC and BTC to BRL using the public orderbook from FOXBIT Exchange | |
| * | |
| * NOTE | |
| * - use CURL to get the orderbook | |
| * - use BCMath for arithmetic | |
| */ |
| Verifying that "elias19r.id" is my Blockstack ID. https://onename.com/elias19r |
| package main | |
| import "log" | |
| func main() { | |
| tests := []struct { | |
| desc string | |
| given uint64 | |
| expected string | |
| }{ |
| #!/bin/bash | |
| file_path='./your-file.csv' | |
| n_lines=5000 | |
| # tail -n +2 $file_path: Prints the whole file starting from the second line (skip header) | |
| # split -l $n_lines - part_: Split the content into small files of $n_lines each named "part_*" | |
| tail -n +2 "${file_path}" | split -l "${n_lines}" - part_ | |
| # For each part_* |
| # Informe aqui as receitas brutas mensais (faturamentos) | |
| receitas_brutas_mensais = [ | |
| 9_999.99, | |
| ] | |
| cliente_reside_no_exterior = true | |
| prolabore_atual = nil | |
| # Salve e rode no terminal: ruby meus_impostos_pj.rb |
| describe "setting an attribute with value from a parameter" do | |
| context "when parameter key is not present" do | |
| it "does not assume any value for the attribute" | |
| it "does not set the attribute" | |
| end | |
| context "when parameter key is present" do | |
| context "when parameter value is not blank" do | |
| it "sets value to the attribute" | |
| end |
| require 'base64' | |
| class UUID | |
| def self.encode64(uuid) | |
| bytes_str = [uuid.delete('-')].pack('H*') | |
| Base64.urlsafe_encode64(bytes_str, padding: false) | |
| end | |
| def self.decode64(base64) |
| require: | |
| - rubocop-performance | |
| - rubocop-rails | |
| - rubocop-rspec | |
| - rubocop-thread_safety | |
| AllCops: | |
| TargetRubyVersion: 3.2.0 | |
| NewCops: enable |
What do you think science is? There's nothing magical about science. It is simply a systematic way for carefully and thoroughly observing nature and using consistent logic to evaluate results. Which part of that exactly do you disagree with? Do you disagree with being thorough? Using careful observation? Being systematic? Or using consistent logic?
-- Steven Novella