You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
PR/deployment: not claimed. This job is communication/adoption workflow and no repository or deployment target was provided.
Upload-files note: PLS context returned deliverable: null, so no deliverable_id was available for the fixed upload-files helper. This pack uses a shared-cloud Gist.
Verification:
Gist published publicly.
HTTP and GitHub CLI verification completed before PLS completion writeback.
Create a follow-up adoption scoring pack instead of repeating the previous one-time message pack.
Problem
The people-sync signal repeats, but PLS context still lacks deliverable, project details, action items, or actual replies. Repeating the same prompt would not improve production maturity.
Options
Recreate the original LINE prompt.
Stop because context lacks replies.
Produce a follow-up scoring and escalation pack.
Build a full adoption system.
Recommendation
Choose option 3.
Reasoning
The next useful step is to capture reply quality and assign follow-up. This keeps the solution lightweight while preparing for SOP/watchdog upgrade if repeated.
Adoption Status
Recommended for immediate use.
Feedback Needed If Not Adopted
Provide actual replies, profile display names, LINE delivery result, and desired customer-proof review owner.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Prosci ADKAR emphasizes that individual change requires awareness, desire, knowledge, ability, and reinforcement. This pack focuses on ability and reinforcement: people must write a usable customer-facing statement and be scored.
McKinsey transformation writing emphasizes sustained behavior and capability change, not only awareness. That supports using a reply tracker and coaching queue.
PLS Maturity Rating
Current maturity: Level 2.5 of 5.
Reason: the signal has a clear leadership concern and a usable first prompt pattern, but reply evidence is not yet captured.
Target D30 maturity: Level 4 of 5.
Reason: PLS should have a customer-proof library, adoption status, and escalation cadence for repeated people-sync gaps.
Job: 0b893bd2-dda3-4c06-8ef0-1b262bb623d0
AI native project: 02b5a090-b490-425c-8f19-e2e6cc3aa51b
Topic: people-response-and-sync
Iteration: follow-up scoring and escalation
Situation
The signal remains the chairman reflection: the team has fallen behind in self-recognition, and customers therefore cannot feel the company's advantages. A prior D1 adoption prompt is not enough unless replies become scoreable and follow-up actions are assigned.
This pack turns the one-time LINE prompt into a measurable response and adoption loop.
D1 / D7 / D14 / D30 Path
D1: Send follow-up message to the three related profiles. Require reply in the structured format and mark each person accepted, needs_coaching, or no_response.
D7: Create a customer-proof library from accepted replies and a coaching queue for weak replies.
D14: Run one rehearsal where each respondent uses the revised advantage sentence in a customer scenario. Score clarity and proof strength.
D30: Upgrade repeated people-sync signals into an adoption scorecard or watchdog when the same response failure repeats three times.
Purpose-To-Purpose E2E
Original purpose: make company advantages visible to customers.
Output: follow-up message pack, scoring rubric, adoption tracker, escalation SOP, and data model.
Human adoption: each person either provides customer-facing proof or is assigned coaching/escalation.
Business improvement: customer conversations become clearer, leadership rework decreases, and weak capability/proof gaps become visible.
Source: company_signal_mastery
Topic key: people-response-and-sync
Recent signal count: 16
Related people: 3
Related projects: 3
Latest evidence: chairman reflection that team self-recognition lags and customers cannot feel company advantages.
Project Annotation
AI-native project 02b5a090-b490-425c-8f19-e2e6cc3aa51b should remain a people adoption project until reply evidence shows whether the gap is messaging, proof, behavior, or actual capability.
Person Annotation
The three related profiles are respondents and should be scored by adoption status.
Decision Annotation
Decision: continue communication path for this round, but introduce scoring and escalation to prepare SOP/watchdog upgrade.
Risk Annotation
Repeated prompt without scoring creates noise.
People agree but do not change customer behavior.
Customer-facing statements may be unproven.
Missing replies hide capability or ownership gaps.
Source Project Handling
Do not merge the three source projects yet. Use reply scores to decide whether projects should merge, split, or upgrade.