| perl -e "s/design/dezine/g;" -pi.save (find info -type f) |
| source :rubygems | |
| gem "sinatra", "~> 1.3.2" | |
| group :test do | |
| gem "minitest", "~> 2.10" | |
| gem "rack-test", "~> 0.6.1" | |
| gem "capybara", "~> 1.1" | |
| gem "capybara-webkit", "~> 0.11" | |
| gem "capybara_minitest_spec", "~> 0.2" |
| {anger} | |
| {"name": "aggressive"}, | |
| {"name": "angry"} | |
| {"name": "angst-ridden"}, | |
| {joy} | |
| {"name": "bouncy"}, | |
| {"name": "calming"}, | |
| {"name": "carefree"}, |
| gem list | cut -d" " -f1 | xargs gem uninstall -aIx |
| Links for essays ref'd in http://blog.fogus.me/2009/03/11/seven-books/ | |
| On the Criteria to Be Used in Decomposing Systems Into Modules – David Parnas | |
| http://www.cs.umd.edu/class/spring2003/cmsc838p/Design/criteria.pdf | |
| A Note On Distributed Computing – Jim Waldo, Geoff Wyant, Ann Wollrath, Sam Kendall | |
| http://labs.oracle.com/techrep/1994/smli_tr-94-29.pdf | |
| The Next 700 Programming Languages – P. J. Landin | |
| http://www.thecorememory.com/Next_700.pdf |
| git status --porcelain | grep 'test' | grep -v 'factories' | cut -c4- | sort | uniq | xargs zeus test |
| require 'rake/testtask' | |
| Rake::TestTask.new do |test_task| | |
| test_task.libs.push 'spec' | |
| test_task.name = 'spec' | |
| test_task.pattern = 'spec/**/*_spec.rb' |
| % octave cheatsheet | |
| % not equals(~=) | |
| 1 ~=2 % => 1 | |
| % change prompt | |
| PS1('>> '); | |
| % search path | |
| setpath('~/some/path') |
BUILT-INS
Obviously, when looking to program functionally in a given language, the first place one should look is within the language itself. Luckily, while not a Functional language (by any stretch of the word), Ruby has many facilities that enable it to act like one.
| setw -g mode-keys vi | |
| set -g default-terminal "screen-256color" | |
| set -g prefix C-a | |
| bind C-a send-prefix | |
| bind z send-keys C-z | |
| bind C-z last-window | |
| bind | spit-window -h |
