<Additional information about your API call. Try to use verbs that match both request type (fetching vs modifying) and plurality (one vs multiple).>
-
URL
<The URL Structure (path only, no root url)>
-
Method:
| Latency Comparison Numbers (~2012) | |
| ---------------------------------- | |
| L1 cache reference 0.5 ns | |
| Branch mispredict 5 ns | |
| L2 cache reference 7 ns 14x L1 cache | |
| Mutex lock/unlock 25 ns | |
| Main memory reference 100 ns 20x L2 cache, 200x L1 cache | |
| Compress 1K bytes with Zippy 3,000 ns 3 us | |
| Send 1K bytes over 1 Gbps network 10,000 ns 10 us | |
| Read 4K randomly from SSD* 150,000 ns 150 us ~1GB/sec SSD |
A commit should be a wrapper for related changes. For example, fixing two different bugs should produce two separate commits. Small commits make it easier for other developers to understand the changes and roll them back if something went wrong. With tools like the staging area and the ability to stage only parts of a file, Git makes it easy to create very granular commits.
Committing often keeps your commits small and, again, helps you commit only related changes. Moreover, it allows you to share your code more frequently with others. That way it‘s easier for everyone to integrate changes regularly and avoid having merge conflicts. Having large commits and sharing them infrequently, in contrast, makes it hard to solve conflicts.
tips to evolve as a developer
developers get stuck, paralized
https://www.oreilly.com/library/view/apprenticeship-patterns/9780596806842/ch04.html
Make It Stick https://www.amazon.com.br/Make-Stick-Science-Successful-Learning/dp/0674729013
Also check Docker Learning Path and Lambda Learning Path
We must explain the problem clearly and identify additional details that the team needs to know. We must here describe the context, what we did so far, and the current state.
The description also serves as a trail that we can go back to in the future to understand the reasoning we had at the time and see what restrictions and requirements have changed.