jdittrich

Law, John. 2004. After Method: Mess in Social Science Research. London ; New York: Routledge.

page/comment

3 is "knowing" the metaphor we need?

4 standard research methods are not generally wrong

5 to have rules seems natural

	Output: whatPart " " changePart ".\n";


	changePart: "will " changes " " bigThing;
	whatPart: AnswerQuestion " the " comeIntoBeing " of " adjectives " " changeAgent;

	changes: "disrupt", "change", "revolutionize", "remake", "turn over";
	bigThing:"the world", "our thinking", "IT", "everything", "education", "society", "humanity", "your brain";
	AnswerQuestion: "Why", "How", "What happens when";
	comeIntoBeing: "raise", "growth", "invention";

	<!doctype html>
	<html lang="us">
	<head>
	<!--
	needs jquery.js, jqueryUI.js, jquerUI.css
	and an image showing the revision slider bars like http://imgur.com/e7LNEDA
	-->
	<meta charset="utf-8">
	<title>Slider Prototype</title>
	<link href="jquery-ui.css" rel="stylesheet">

	Output: Sentence "\n";

	Sentence: SentenceIamGreat, SentenceBlaming, SentenceProduct, AdviceStupid, SentenceMake;

	SentenceIamGreat: "It is a " HowItIs " "Thing ". " ParticleAfterMe;

	AdviceStupid: "They say: " Advice "." ("I mean, like " areLike " programmers do?!",ParticleAfterOthers);

	SentenceBlaming: (mainAntagonist=Antagonist) ParticleBefore ": The " mainAntagonist "is " evil (".","!"{1,6}) ParticleAfterMe;

	//following adapted from https://stackoverflow.com/a/44185784/263398
	var data2 = [{
	name: "Children C1",
	paths: [["A", "B", "C"],["A", "B"]]
	}, {
	name: "Children C2",
	paths: [["A", "B", "C"]]
	}, {
	name: "Children C3",
	paths: [["A", "B", "C"]]


	'''
	The function call behaviour seems to be identical to the javascript version; I could not find any differences
	However, the resulting tree is not identical, the javascript version "reuses" the paths,
	whereas the python one seems to create a new path on every occasion.

	'''
	#following adapted from https://stackoverflow.com/a/44185784/263398 and ported to Python

	from functools import reduce

	//Data for testing it
	var dataobject = {
	rows:[
	{Preis:"100",Geraet:"Android Phone"},
	{Preis:"600",Geraet:"iPad"},
	{Preis:"1000",Geraet:"Thinkpad"}
	]
	};

	//get all column names. Use the first object in rows for that.

	var s = document.createElement("script");
	s.type = "text/javascript";
	s.src = "https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/mark.js/8.11.0/mark.js";
	$("head").append(s);
	var markinstance = new Mark(document.querySelectorAll("p,ul,li,quote, cite"));//all common elements pandoc puts out.
	markinstance.markRegExp(/(\.\|;\|—\|\:)/gim, {className:"strongHighlight"}); //sentence lenght
	markinstance.markRegExp(/(was \|will \|do \|is \|of )/gim); //simple passive verbs
	markinstance.markRegExp(/( is that)/gim); //no "is that"

	# THEMEN

	## ANT und lokal/global

	* 95,105 ANT ist nicht lokaler oder weniger Abstrakt als andere Soziologische Theorien (auch: 392, 352)
	* Akteur/Netzwerk entspricht Lokales/verbundenes
	* 315 Abstraktes soll werden zu: "Wo", "Wann", "Womit"
	* 352 Nichts ist nur lokal oder nur global
	* 392 Globales und Lokales existieren gleichzeitig, nicht entweder oder
	* 407 Je mehr verknüpfungen, desto besser