joaoqalves

#!/usr/bin/expect -f
set timeout 500
set pass    0


if { $argc < 2 } {

	puts "Usage:\r"
	puts "myrcom <eiXXXXX> <pc> (eg: 70,80,20,50) |password|\r"
	exit

joaoqalves

#!/usr/bin/python

from bluetooth import *
from threading import Thread
import time
import random


def communication( skt, info ):
	skt.settimeout(3)

joaoqalves

import sbt._
import Keys._

object Build extends Build {
  import BuildSettings._
  import Dependencies._

  lazy val root = Project("kioo-mobile-app-backend", file("."))
    .settings(basicSettings: _*)
    .settings(libraryDependencies ++=

joaoqalves

Keybase proof

I hereby claim:

• I am joaoqalves on github.
• I am joaoqalves (https://keybase.io/joaoqalves) on keybase.
• I have a public key whose fingerprint is 2524 8CFB 6DE6 0609 35F3 CEF4 BF52 78FC 85E6 095B

To claim this, I am signing this object:

joaoqalves

#!/bin/bash
apt-get -y update
apt-get -y install curl
apt-get -y install build-essential
apt-get -y install python-dev
apt-get -y install python-setuptools
curl -L https://bootstrap.saltstack.com -o install_salt.sh
sh install_salt.sh -P stable

joaoqalves

#!/usr/bin/env python
# -*- coding: utf-8 -*-

import json
import requests
import sys

__BASE_URL = "https://api-game.laligafantasymarca.com/api/1"
__TOKEN = "xxxx" # get it after logging in to the website
__AUTH_HEADER = "Bearer {0}".format(__TOKEN)

joaoqalves

I may be a bit outdated about GCP but if I am I guess you’ll correct me :) I’m no infrastructure expert though. My knowledge comes from a small comparison that we did in my previous company [biased ‘cause we had a AWS certified guy :)]:

Feature-wise, AWS has a fine-grained user management that may be important for large companies. Same for network topologies [again, big companies]. More flexibility when choosing an instance in AWS (~30 vs ~20 instance types). AWS is more powerful when it comes to handle hybrid cloud solutions. AWS' ElastiCache has no equivalent in GCP, I think. RDS is years ahead of Google SQL engine. 

About tooling: a lot of open-source _CLI_s and open-source tools that leverage AWS. A certification program, etc etc… all of this increases AWS value for a client. And that’s why they can charge more and that’s why comparing only prices is not fair. Even comparing services would be “risky” [from a business perspective], due to the stability and proven success of AWS over the last 10 years. I 

joaoqalves

#!/usr/bin/env python
# -*- coding: utf-8 -*-

from functools import partial


def curried(n):
    def curry(fn):
        def _inner(*args):
            if len(args) < n:

joaoqalves

0499012070ecc4497830b7608b3f3c56f7a197cb532000309f9a1fdda91218dca6609ec7b6d4fe4fd5530e4656f7b2128afcd4f22cf0086afcb7a5826a79443edf

joaoqalves

import javax.sql.DataSource;
import org.springframework.batch.core.configuration.annotation.DefaultBatchConfigurer;

public class InMemoryBatchConfigurer extends DefaultBatchConfigurer {
    public void setDataSource(DataSource dataSource) {
      // This is intentionally left blank
    }

}