<Additional information about your API call. Try to use verbs that match both request type (fetching vs modifying) and plurality (one vs multiple).>
-
URL
<The URL Structure (path only, no root url)>
-
Method:
A complete list of books, articles, blog posts, videos and neat pages that support Data Fundamentals (H), organised by Unit.
If the resource is available online (legally) I have included a link to it. Each entry has symbols following it.
| #!/bin/bash | |
| if [ $# -eq 0 ]; then | |
| echo "Usage: ./pushover <message> [title]" | |
| exit | |
| fi | |
| MESSAGE=$1 | |
| TITLE=$2 |
The major important thing is the documentation has to be implementation independent and specification concise. Dependencies where ever necessary are allowed to be specified.
Also it is allows HTML tags to be used in between the documentation comments. Pretty much all tags are self explanatory.
Meta Annotations
@author Ex: @author Jane Doe
@version Ex: @version v1.0-alpha
A pattern for building personal knowledge bases using LLMs.
This is an idea file, it is designed to be copy pasted to your own LLM Agent (e.g. OpenAI Codex, Claude Code, OpenCode / Pi, or etc.). Its goal is to communicate the high level idea, but your agent will build out the specifics in collaboration with you.
Most people's experience with LLMs and documents looks like RAG: you upload a collection of files, the LLM retrieves relevant chunks at query time, and generates an answer. This works, but the LLM is rediscovering knowledge from scratch on every question. There's no accumulation. Ask a subtle question that requires synthesizing five documents, and the LLM has to find and piece together the relevant fragments every time. Nothing is built up. NotebookLM, ChatGPT file uploads, and most RAG systems work this way.