Picking the right architecture = Picking the right battles + Managing trade-offs
| $ python xor.py | |
| Training: | |
| Epoch 0 MSE: 1.765 | |
| Epoch 100 MSE: 0.015 | |
| Epoch 200 MSE: 0.005 | |
| * Target MSE reached * | |
| Evaluating: | |
| 1 XOR 0 = 1 ( 0.904) Error: 0.096 | |
| 0 XOR 1 = 1 ( 0.908) Error: 0.092 | |
| 1 XOR 1 = 0 (-0.008) Error: 0.008 |
| -e git://github.com/kennethreitz/inbox.py.git@551b4f44b144564504c687cebdb4c543cb8e9adf#egg=inbox | |
| alembic==0.8.3 | |
| amqp==1.4.9 | |
| anyjson==0.3.3 | |
| boto==2.39.0 | |
| braintree==3.20.0 | |
| cairosvg==1.0.19 | |
| celery==3.1.20 |
| ssh-keygen -t rsa -b 4096 -m PEM -f jwtRS256.key | |
| # Don't add passphrase | |
| openssl rsa -in jwtRS256.key -pubout -outform PEM -out jwtRS256.key.pub | |
| cat jwtRS256.key | |
| cat jwtRS256.key.pub |
| // Usage: | |
| // Copy and paste all of this into a debug console window of the "Who is Hiring?" comment thread | |
| // then use as follows: | |
| // | |
| // query(term | [term, term, ...], term | [term, term, ...], ...) | |
| // | |
| // When arguments are in an array then that means an "or" and when they are seperate that means "and" | |
| // | |
| // Term is of the format: | |
| // ((-)text/RegExp) ( '-' means negation ) |
Hi Nicholas,
I saw you tweet about JSX yesterday. It seemed like the discussion devolved pretty quickly but I wanted to share our experience over the last year. I understand your concerns. I've made similar remarks about JSX. When we started using it Planning Center, I led the charge to write React without it. I don't imagine I'd have much to say that you haven't considered but, if it's helpful, here's a pattern that changed my opinion:
The idea that "React is the V in MVC" is disingenuous. It's a good pitch but, for many of us, it feels like in invitation to repeat our history of coupled views. In practice, React is the V and the C. Dan Abramov describes the division as Smart and Dumb Components. At our office, we call them stateless and container components (view-controllers if we're Flux). The idea is pretty simple: components can't
Rich Hickey • 3 years ago
Sorry, I have to disagree with the entire premise here.
A wide variety of experiences might lead to well-roundedness, but not to greatness, nor even goodness. By constantly switching from one thing to another you are always reaching above your comfort zone, yes, but doing so by resetting your skill and knowledge level to zero.
Mastery comes from a combination of at least several of the following:
| { | |
| "lines.linewidth": 2.0, | |
| "examples.download": true, | |
| "patch.linewidth": 0.5, | |
| "legend.fancybox": true, | |
| "axes.color_cycle": [ | |
| "#30a2da", | |
| "#fc4f30", | |
| "#e5ae38", | |
| "#6d904f", |
(by @andrestaltz)
If you prefer to watch video tutorials with live-coding, then check out this series I recorded with the same contents as in this article: Egghead.io - Introduction to Reactive Programming.
