This is a list of general QA-QC procedures for evaluating GIS vector data. These are methods I've had success with for catching common errors and anomalies. These techniques focus on identifying higher level issues that can be overlooked when the data is peer-reviewed at a “down in the weeds” level specific to the content of the data layers.
Most often, granular data edit errors are caught in peer-level review. After all that is the whole purpose of these reviews. These are the reviews focused on “Did all the sewer lines get added? Did all of the attributes on the sewer lines get filled out correctly?" These reviews are good at catching if a feature line was missed and not added to the shapefile, a feature attribute that could have been filled out was left empty or was filled in with an incorrect value, etc.
With all the hard work to make sure the nitty-gritty details were captured in the feature class, there can be bigger picture issues that cause problems which may not be immediately evi