Since Twitter doesn't have an edit button, it's a suitable host for JavaScript modules.
Source tweet: https://twitter.com/rauchg/status/712799807073419264
const leftPad = await requireFromTwitter('712799807073419264');
Since Twitter doesn't have an edit button, it's a suitable host for JavaScript modules.
Source tweet: https://twitter.com/rauchg/status/712799807073419264
const leftPad = await requireFromTwitter('712799807073419264');
All of the below properties or methods, when requested/called in JavaScript, will trigger the browser to synchronously calculate the style and layout*. This is also called reflow or layout thrashing, and is common performance bottleneck.
Generally, all APIs that synchronously provide layout metrics will trigger forced reflow / layout. Read on for additional cases and details.
elem.offsetLeft
, elem.offsetTop
, elem.offsetWidth
, elem.offsetHeight
, elem.offsetParent
Hi Nicholas,
I saw you tweet about JSX yesterday. It seemed like the discussion devolved pretty quickly but I wanted to share our experience over the last year. I understand your concerns. I've made similar remarks about JSX. When we started using it Planning Center, I led the charge to write React without it. I don't imagine I'd have much to say that you haven't considered but, if it's helpful, here's a pattern that changed my opinion:
The idea that "React is the V in MVC" is disingenuous. It's a good pitch but, for many of us, it feels like in invitation to repeat our history of coupled views. In practice, React is the V and the C. Dan Abramov describes the division as Smart and Dumb Components. At our office, we call them stateless and container components (view-controllers if we're Flux). The idea is pretty simple: components can't
Solution to https://twitter.com/nolanlawson/status/578948854411878400.
doSomething().then(function () {
var webpack = require('webpack'); | |
var HtmlWebpackPlugin = require('html-webpack-plugin'); | |
var path = require('path'); | |
var folders = { | |
APP: path.resolve(__dirname, '../app'), | |
BUILD: path.resolve(__dirname, '../build'), | |
BOWER: path.resolve(__dirname, '../bower_components'), | |
NPM: path.resolve(__dirname, '../node_modules') | |
}; |
import { Component } from "React"; | |
export var Enhance = ComposedComponent => class extends Component { | |
constructor() { | |
this.state = { data: null }; | |
} | |
componentDidMount() { | |
this.setState({ data: 'Hello' }); | |
} | |
render() { |
The final result: require() any module on npm in your browser console with browserify
This article is written to explain how the above gif works in the chrome (and other) browser consoles. A quick disclaimer: this whole thing is a huge hack, it shouldn't be used for anything seriously, and there are probably much better ways of accomplishing the same.
Update: There are much better ways of accomplishing the same, and the script has been updated to use a much simpler method pulling directly from browserify-cdn. See this thread for details: mathisonian/requirify#5
$ git clone https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/tools/depot_tools.git
$ nano ~/.zshrc
path=('/path/to/depot_tools' $path)
(by @andrestaltz)
If you prefer to watch video tutorials with live-coding, then check out this series I recorded with the same contents as in this article: Egghead.io - Introduction to Reactive Programming.