You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Last active
March 17, 2020 21:19— forked from LemoNode/.block
Multiline chart
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
It’s election season again y’all! That means a ton of engineers at news orgs are spending sleepless nights building different reader experiences with various tech stacks. In years past I’ve informally compared all the different approaches because I find it educational. One big reason, the faster your page is, the easier it is for folks to enjoy it regardless of their internet connection speeds.
Methodology
Links were gathered via Twitter, primarily using a thread by Tiff Fehr. Basic criteria are the page has to feature updating vote and/or delegate counts. Scores were tallied after running PageSpeed Insights at least three times to establish an average. Additionally, AMP pages were used over non-AMP page versions with the main assumption being that readers are coming to the page on mobile either via social media or after searching for election results. I was also really curious to see how AMP performed when it came to interacti
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters