| import slick.lifted.MappedTypeMapper | |
| import java.sql.Date | |
| import org.joda.time.DateTime | |
| import slick.lifted.TypeMapper.DateTypeMapper | |
| object DateTimeMapper { | |
| implicit def date2dateTime = MappedTypeMapper.base[DateTime, Date] ( | |
| dateTime => new Date(dateTime.getMillis), | |
| date => new DateTime(date) |
This Gist is created in 2014, and it's highliy outdated now, according to one of mitmproxy's manjor contributor (check his comment below). Thanks for letting us know, @mhils!
Modern applications usually make use of back-end API servers to provide their services. With a non-transparent HTTPs proxy, which intercepts the communication between clients and servers (aka the man-in-the-middle scheme), you can easily manipulate both API requests and responses.
| #!/bin/sh | |
| # one way (older scala version will be installed) | |
| # sudo apt-get install scala | |
| #2nd way | |
| sudo apt-get remove scala-library scala | |
| wget http://www.scala-lang.org/files/archive/scala-2.11.4.deb | |
| sudo dpkg -i scala-2.11.4.deb | |
| sudo apt-get update |
| # irssi-xmpp plugin required | |
| # http://cybione.org/~irssi-xmpp/ | |
| servers = ( | |
| { | |
| address = "chat.facebook.com"; | |
| chatnet = "facebook"; | |
| password = "<password>"; | |
| autoconnect = "true"; | |
| }, | |
| { |
I've done the same process every couple years since 2013 (Mountain Lion, Mavericks, High Sierra, Catalina) and I updated the Gist each time I've done it.
I kinda regret for not using something like Boxen (or anything similar) to automate the process, but TBH I only actually needed to these steps once every couple years...
| /* | |
| * Copyright (c) 2013 Plausible Labs Cooperative, Inc. | |
| * All rights reserved. | |
| * | |
| * Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person | |
| * obtaining a copy of this software and associated documentation | |
| * files (the "Software"), to deal in the Software without | |
| * restriction, including without limitation the rights to use, | |
| * copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell | |
| * copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the |
I want to be extremely clear about three things. First, this is my personal opinion – insert full standard disclaimer. Second, this is not a condemnation of everyone at RSA, present and past. I assume most of them are pretty okay, and that the problem is confined to a few specific points in the company. However, “unknown problem people making major decisions at RSA” is a bit unwieldy, so I will just say RSA. Third, I'm not calling for a total boycott on RSA. I work almost literally across the street from them and I don’t want to get beat up by roving gangs of cryptographers at the local Chipotle.
RSA's denial published last night is utter codswallop that denies pretty much everything in the world except the actual allegations put forth by Reuters and hinted at for months by [other sources](http://li
Bla bla bla this is my personal opinion bla bla bla.
Patents. Can’t live with violating them, can’t live without violating them. The entire concept of patented cryptography is a bit beyond what I have the energy to deal with right now. Whatever. We’re going in.
It didn’t click with me yesterday, reading the crypto news, that I had already quoted one Dan Brown with whom we are now concerned. No, not the one who wrote the novels. One of the other ones. I cited him in my timeline of trying to reconstruct where and when exactly Dual EC DRBG went so wrong. Specifically, the paper has a casual mention (bottom of page 7) that the proof of security relies on initialization value Q being random, because if it is not random, an adversary in-the-know can recover the prestates and everything’s downhill from there. Therefore – and I quote – it is generally preferable for Q to be c
THIS GIST WAS MOVED TO TERMSTANDARD/COLORS REPOSITORY.
PLEASE ASK YOUR QUESTIONS OR ADD ANY SUGGESTIONS AS A REPOSITORY ISSUES OR PULL REQUESTS INSTEAD!