roychri

Stream Ollama (openai) chat completion API on CLI with HTTPie and jq

Explanation

This command sends a request to the Chat Completion API to generate high-level documentation for the file @src/arch.js. The API is configured to use the llama3-gradient model and to respond in Markdown format.

The messages array contains two elements:

• The first element is a system message that provides the prompt for the API.
• The second element is a user message that specifies the file for which to generate documentation.

roychri

#!/bin/sh

# Go back 1 hour for 1000 loops to add data to redis.

# Inspired by:
# * https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/339938/busybox-date-command-set-time-with-unix-timestamp
# * https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/22600/how-to-get-3-minutes-future-date
# * https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/494581/date-command-in-busybox-not-accepting-formatted-input-date

for H in $(seq 1 1000); do

roychri

{
  "name": "azure-hello-world",
  "version": "1.0.0",
  "lockfileVersion": 1
}

roychri

function otherFunctionResolve() {
    return Promise.resolve();
}

function otherFunctionReject() {
    return Promise.reject();
}

function otherFunctionThrow() {
    throw new Error("oops");

roychri

# Script that delete large amount of bull jobs using arena's API
#
# Requirements:
# * pup (https://github.com/ericchiang/pup)
# * sed
# * tr
# * curl
#
# This was tested with BASH

roychri

FROM node:9.9.0-alpine

ARG tag=latest

LABEL image=jaumard/test:${tag} \
      maintainer="Jaumard" \
      base=node:9.9.0-alpine

RUN set -ex

roychri

This is an implementation similar to setInternal() but will not start the delay/loop again until the callback has finished (presuming it returned a promise). Im interested to know if there's a better way to do this. I choose this rather than using setInterval() because I wanted to make sure it would not start over if the callback took longer than the interval time.

The callback function will only be called once an initial delay has passed. It would be simple to add a call to cb() before calling the loop.

Let me know what you think!

roychri

WARNING

Heavy metaprogramming ahead...

Summary

This is an attempt/experiment at being able to temporarily observe an active record through callbacks.

To Do

roychri

+------------+-------------+------------+-------------+------------+
| date       | video_views | clip_views | video_plays | clip_plays |
+------------+-------------+------------+-------------+------------+
| 2016-09-21 |        9166 |       2237 |        2342 |       1622 |
| 2016-09-22 |       63967 |      20235 |       23900 |      15616 |
| 2016-09-23 |      184224 |      69347 |      103441 |      51579 |
| 2016-09-24 |       62307 |      17288 |       25074 |      12300 |
| 2016-09-25 |       27367 |       7250 |        6499 |       5060 |
| 2016-09-26 |       51912 |      13901 |       12038 |      10471 |
| 2016-09-27 |       61551 |      19965 |       18761 |      15030 |

roychri

# While on master which is up to date.
git checkout -b feature9
# <work>, <commit>, <work>, <commit>, ...
git fetch origin/master
git rebase master
git checkout master
git pull
git rebase feature9
# Oopps, I wanted to do -i
git reglog