- Copy a film roll (a directory of RAW images) into a directory on the machine running Darktable.
- Import the film roll into Darktable.
- Review the images using lighttable mode and remove any images that are beyond repair.
- Take a snapshot of the image so we can do a before and after comparison.
- Adjust the white balance.
- Exposure compensation and recovery.
| # | |
| # Some state file... | |
| # | |
| {% for site, args in pillar.get('sites', {}).items() %} | |
| /etc/nginx/sites-available/{{ site }}: | |
| file.managed: | |
| - source: salt://nginx/files/site.conf.jinja | |
| - template: jinja | |
| - context: | |
| site: {{ site }} |
| zsock_t *radio = zsock_new_radio ("inproc://zframe-test-radio"); | |
| zsock_t *dish = zsock_new_dish ("inproc://zframe-test-radio"); | |
| // Use following for multicast | |
| // zsock_t *radio = zsock_new_radio ("udp://239.0.0.1:55555"); | |
| // zsock_t *dish = zsock_new_dish ("udp://239.0.0.1:55555"); | |
| // Join to group | |
| rc = zsock_join (dish, "World"); | |
| assert (rc == 0); |
One of the best ways to reduce complexity (read: stress) in web development is to minimize the differences between your development and production environments. After being frustrated by attempts to unify the approach to SSL on my local machine and in production, I searched for a workflow that would make the protocol invisible to me between all environments.
Most workflows make the following compromises:
-
Use HTTPS in production but HTTP locally. This is annoying because it makes the environments inconsistent, and the protocol choices leak up into the stack. For example, your web application needs to understand the underlying protocol when using the
secureflag for cookies. If you don't get this right, your HTTP development server won't be able to read the cookies it writes, or worse, your HTTPS production server could pass sensitive cookies over an insecure connection. -
Use production SSL certificates locally. This is annoying
One of the best ways to reduce complexity (read: stress) in web development is to minimize the differences between your development and production environments. After being frustrated by attempts to unify the approach to SSL on my local machine and in production, I searched for a workflow that would make the protocol invisible to me between all environments.
Most workflows make the following compromises:
-
Use HTTPS in production but HTTP locally. This is annoying because it makes the environments inconsistent, and the protocol choices leak up into the stack. For example, your web application needs to understand the underlying protocol when using the
secureflag for cookies. If you don't get this right, your HTTP development server won't be able to read the cookies it writes, or worse, your HTTPS production server could pass sensitive cookies over an insecure connection. -
Use production SSL certificates locally. This is annoying
One of the best ways to reduce complexity (read: stress) in web development is to minimize the differences between your development and production environments. After being frustrated by attempts to unify the approach to SSL on my local machine and in production, I searched for a workflow that would make the protocol invisible to me between all environments.
Most workflows make the following compromises:
-
Use HTTPS in production but HTTP locally. This is annoying because it makes the environments inconsistent, and the protocol choices leak up into the stack. For example, your web application needs to understand the underlying protocol when using the
secureflag for cookies. If you don't get this right, your HTTP development server won't be able to read the cookies it writes, or worse, your HTTPS production server could pass sensitive cookies over an insecure connection. -
Use production SSL certificates locally. This is annoying