i want you to do detailed Rich Hickey inspired review of our architecture. what have complected? launch another inspired by John Ousterhout and a Yaron Minsky review
now shriram krishnamurthi's review ... Kmett's: then finally Casey Muratori ...
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| https://x.com/__alpoge__/status/2087504785952182273 4096 unreadable chars and a shell script. | |
| ---- | |
| Lemma: four ±1 circulants of order m, row sums (2,0,0,0), ΣPAF(s) = −4 for s≠0 ⇒ the bordered Goethals–Seidel array is Hadamard of order 4m+4. 668 = 4·166+4. | |
| Proof: Write X for A, B, C, D and m = 166. The autocorrelation hypothesis says AAᵀ + BBᵀ + CCᵀ + DDᵀ = (4m+4)I − 4J. In the Goethals–Seidel array the R-conjugates of circulants commute, so the body Gram matrix is I₄ ⊗ (ΣXXᵀ) = (4m+4)I − 4(I₄ ⊗ J). Distinct body rows therefore have body inner product −4 within a block row and 0 across block rows. | |
| Border the array by prefixing the four block rows with the pairwise orthogonal vectors +++−, −−+−, −+−−, +−−−. Two body rows in the same block row share a prefix, contributing +4 and cancelling the −4. Two body rows in different block rows contribute 0 in the prefix and 0 in the body. All body rows are now orthogonal, and each has norm 4m+4. | |
| Adjoin four border rows whose blocks are constant ±1. Against a body r |
OlderNewer