| (ns cognician.db.translate | |
| (:require [datomic.api :as d]) | |
| (:import [clojure.lang MapEntry] | |
| [datomic.query EntityMap])) | |
| ;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;; | |
| ;;; Language | |
| (def default-language :en-GB) |
| $script:bg = [Console]::BackgroundColor; | |
| $script:first = $true; | |
| $script:last = 0; | |
| function Write-PromptFancyEnd { | |
| Write-Host -NoNewline -ForegroundColor $script:bg | |
| $script:bg = [System.ConsoleColor]::Black | |
| } |
Should be work with 0.18
Destructuring(or pattern matching) is a way used to extract data from a data structure(tuple, list, record) that mirros the construction. Compare to other languages, Elm support much less destructuring but let's see what it got !
myTuple = ("A", "B", "C")
myNestedTuple = ("A", "B", "C", ("X", "Y", "Z"))
Result of running these benchmarks on Chrome 45.0.2454.101
These numbers seem to be pretty consistent on Blink-based browsers (Chrome and Opera) but are more like 20% to 50% improvements on FireFox, Safari, and IE. I am not sure how to explain that, so take these numbers more as an indicator of “Elm is generating faster code across the board” as opposed to “Elm is 10x faster!”
| open System.Collections.Generic | |
| open Microsoft.FSharp.Collections | |
| [<RequireQualifiedAccess>] | |
| module Folds = | |
| // These are the fast implementations we actually want to use |
| namespace Newtonsoft.Json.Converters | |
| open Microsoft.FSharp.Reflection | |
| open Newtonsoft.Json | |
| open System | |
| type IdiomaticDuConverter() = | |
| inherit JsonConverter() | |
| [<Literal>] |
| <!-- SEO rules (from: http://www.seomoz.org/blog/what-every-seo-should-know-about-iis#chaining) --> | |
| <!-- SEO | Section 1 | Whitelist --> | |
| <rule name="Whitelist - Resources" stopProcessing="true"> | |
| <match url="^(?:css/|scripts/|images/|install/|config/|umbraco/|umbraco_client/|base/|webresource\.axd|scriptresource\.axd|__browserLink|[^/]*/arterySignalR/.*)" /> | |
| <conditions logicalGrouping="MatchAll" trackAllCaptures="false" /> | |
| <action type="None" /> | |
| </rule> | |
| <!-- SEO | Section 2 | Rewrites (chaining) --> | |
| <rule name="SEO - Remove default.aspx" stopProcessing="false"> | |
| <match url="(.*?)/?default\.aspx$" /> |
| (* | |
| This script analyzes the dependencies between top level types in a .NET Assembly. | |
| It is then used to compare the dependency relationships in some F# projects with those in some C# projects. | |
| Note that no attempt has been made to optimize the code yet! | |
| REQUIRES: | |
| * Mono.Cecil for code analysis | |
| From http://www.mono-project.com/Cecil#Download |
| g_LastCtrlKeyDownTime := 0 | |
| g_AbortSendEsc := false | |
| g_ControlRepeatDetected := false | |
| *CapsLock:: | |
| if (g_ControlRepeatDetected) | |
| { | |
| return | |
| } |