viveknarang

import java.util.Scanner;

public class SimonSays {
   public static void main (String [] args) {
      String simonPattern = "";
      String userPattern = "";
      int userScore = 0;
      int i = 0;

      userScore = 0;

viveknarang

import java.util.Scanner;

public class GrocerySorter {
   public enum GroceryItem {GR_APPLES, GR_BANANAS, GR_JUICE, GR_WATER};
      public static void main (String [] args) {

      GroceryItem userItem = GroceryItem.GR_APPLES;

      /* Your solution goes here  */
      if (userItem == GroceryItem.GR_APPLES || userItem == GroceryItem.GR_BANANAS) {

viveknarang

import java.util.Scanner;

public class InsectGrowth {
   public static void main (String [] args) {
      int numInsects = 0;

      numInsects = 8; // Must be >= 1

      while(numInsects < 100) {
         System.out.print(numInsects + " ");

viveknarang

public class NestedLoop {
   public static void main (String [] args) {
      int userNum  = 0;
      int i = 0;
      int j = 0;

      /* Your solution goes here  */
      for (i = 0; i <= userNum; i++) {
         for (j = 0; j < i; j++) {
          System.out.print(" ");  

viveknarang

public class NestedLoops {
   public static void main (String [] args) {
      int numRows = 2;
      int numCols = 3;

      // Note: You'll need to declare more variables

      /* Your solution goes here  */
      for (int i = 1 ; i <= numRows; i++) {
         for(int j = 1 ; j <= numCols; j++) {

viveknarang

Execute:

> SELECT propCode, SUM(lineItemCost) FROM Preventative where SPRIORITY = 'Preventive Maint' group by propCode



+ ------------- + ---------------------- +

| propCode      | SUM(lineItemCost)      |

viveknarang

public class FindSpaces {
   public static void main (String [] args) {
      String passCode = "";

      passCode = " ";

      for (int i = 0 ; i < passCode.length(); i++) {
    	  if (passCode.charAt(i) == ' ') {
    		  System.out.println("Space at " + i);
    	  }

viveknarang

/*			SolrNode node = new SolrNode(commitID, "", "", false);
			node.doAction(SolrNodeAction.NODE_START);
			node.createCollection("Core-" + UUID.randomUUID(), "Collection-" + UUID.randomUUID());
			SolrIndexingClient client = new SolrIndexingClient("localhost", node.port, commitID);

			String collectionName1 = "" + UUID.randomUUID();
			node.createCollection("Core-" + UUID.randomUUID(), collectionName1);
			BenchmarkReportData.metricMapStandaloneConcurrent1 = client.indexData(numDocuments, collectionName1, 1,
					true, TestType.STANDALONE_INDEXING_THROUGHPUT_CONCURRENT_1, node.getBaseUrl());
			node.deleteCollection(collectionName1);

viveknarang

[13:14] == SolrUser [6020d824@gateway/web/freenode/ip.96.32.216.36] has joined #solr
[13:14] == shellac [[email protected]] has joined #solr
[13:14] == clyon_ [[email protected]] has joined #solr
[13:15] <SolrUser> Hi, So I am trying to index documents using the ConcurrentUpdateSolrClient but even with different thread counts I do not notice any changes in indexing time ?
[13:16] <SolrUser> is there something i am not doing right ?
[13:20] <@hoss> SolrUser: it's posible that the code you have feeding docs to your SolrClient is itself the bottleneck
[13:20] <@hoss> in general, i'm not really a fan of ConcurrentUpdateSolrClient -- it doesn't do what most people expect, and it's error handling mechanincs are confusing
[13:20] <SolrUser> okay
[13:21] <@hoss> i haven't done extenisive testing to prove it, but i'm pretty sure that with a well configured HttpClient using aggressive keep-alive options, you can get HttpSolrClient to be just as efficient
[13:21] <

viveknarang

git log \
    --pretty=format:'{%n  "commit": "%H",%n  "author": "%aN",%n  "date": "%ad",%n  "message": "%f",%n "author email": "%ae",%n "timestamp": "%at",%n "committer name": "%cn",%n "committer email": "%ce",%n "commit date": "%cd"%n},' \
    $@ | \
    perl -pe 'BEGIN{print "["}; END{print "]\n"}' | \
    perl -pe 's/},]/}]/'