The bits of the paper I deliberately left out:
- Comparisons:
- correctness and comprehensibility were deemed similar for both Modularizations, so I left it out.
- independent development: Modularization 2 was deemed better, as in Modularization 1 the devs building each module would have to agree upon and develop the shared input storage.
- Efficiency:
- I had trouble understanding this bit, think it had more relevance to the programming systems of the time: "(Modularization 2), if implemented with the conventional assumption that a module consists of one or more subroutines, will be less efficient in most cases."
- An anecdotal example of building a translator was given in further support of "Information Hiding".