|
Problems
News requires free-speech yet auto-censorship obstacles it News are public good yet there is lack of incentives for news for public interest Fake news is a problem but centralized fact-checking is another problem Intermediaries, such as news agencies, taking lions share from the revenue to the degree that it's barely feasible to a reporter to make a news. |
Solution
Anonymous reporting Decentralized news curation Decentralized fact-checking No intermediaries, reporter gets all the revenue |
Unique Value Proposition
A platform where there is incentive to make news that actually matters without auto-censorship, fake news and intermediaries. |
Unfair Advantage
Network effects of userbase, reports and reputation. |
Customer Segments
Independent news reporters Wistleblowers New readers |
|
|
Key Metrics
Frequency of reported news News curation participation rate Total bounty amount of news' Total revenue made by reporting news |
Channels
Advertisements |
||||
|
Cost Structure
Software Development Network transaction fees Arbitration fees Marketing |
Fact-checkers pay %1.6 of the security deposit to challenge a news piece. Half of this value is used to buy platform tokens and burn and the other half will be sent to the reward pool, which distributes rewards to news reporters. Rewards are weighted by news curations. Burned tokens will appreciate in price. News curation by readers also will be done by platform tokens and it will drive prices higher. | ||||
-
-
Save 0xferit/3eeb534dc1d902c6b9d4268ec1bf1b14 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
The Lean Canvas of Decentralized Gazette
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment