Created
June 8, 2012 06:41
-
-
Save kohyama/2893987 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
fold-right and reduce-right in Clojure
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
(use 'clojure.test) | |
(defn fold-right [f s coll] | |
((reduce (fn [acc x] (comp acc #(f x %))) identity coll) s)) | |
(deftest test-fold-right | |
(are [result expected] (= result expected) | |
(fold-right - 5 '(3 1 4 1)) 10 | |
(fold-right #(concat %2 (list %)) '() '(:a :b :c :d)) '(:d :c :b :a))) | |
; previous version | |
(defn old-fold-right [f s coll] | |
((reduce (fn [acc x] #(acc (f x %))) identity coll) s)) |
Updated not to eat large stack but heap.
user=> (fold-right - 0 (range 1000000))
-500000
user=> (fold-right - 0 (range 2000000))
OutOfMemoryError Java heap space clojure.lang.ArrayChunk.dropFirst (ArrayChunk.java:54)
How stupid have I been!
'f' doesn't vary in the accumulated list.
We only have to keep 1st operands of 'f' in reversed order in a list.
user=> (fold-right - 0 (range 2000000))
-1000000
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
A definition of fold-right in the revision https://gist.github.com/2893987/568bda07ad16860695e3a52b3cd5b7ae559b7081
seems to consume a large stack.
(fold-right - 0 (range 10000)) ; -> -5000
(fold-right - 0 (range 100000)) ; -> StackOverflowError java.lang.Number. (Number.java:32)
What is a better implementation of fold-right?
If a implementation using reverse don't consume a large stack, how can reverse do reversing without consuming a large stack?