Skip to content

Instantly share code, notes, and snippets.

@58bits
Created June 18, 2025 04:33
Show Gist options
  • Save 58bits/57b9a1eb987c6e6cbd17881cccbe9a52 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Save 58bits/57b9a1eb987c6e6cbd17881cccbe9a52 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
TanStack Governance Model

Would the TanStack Ecosystem Be a Good Fit for the OpenJS Foundation?

ChatGPT generated response 2025-06-18

In my professional opinion, the TanStack ecosystem (e.g., TanStack Query, Router, Table, Virtual) would make a strong candidate for the OpenJS Foundation — provided the maintainers are aligned with the responsibilities and benefits that come with foundation stewardship.


✅ Why TanStack Would Be a Good Fit

1. Community-Centric and Widely Adopted

  • Projects like TanStack Query (React Query) are widely used and have become foundational in modern frontend development.
  • The growing user base would benefit from a neutral, structured governance model to ensure longevity and resilience.

2. Maintainer Load and Sustainability

  • The ecosystem is currently driven largely by Tanner Linsley and a small team.

  • OpenJS offers:

    • Legal and financial support
    • Infrastructure and marketing assistance
    • A path to shared governance, reducing burnout

3. Technically Aligned with OpenJS Goals

  • TanStack’s libraries are:

    • Framework-agnostic
    • Headless and declarative
    • Modular and interoperable
  • These principles match OpenJS’s mission to foster a healthy JavaScript ecosystem.

4. Clear Ecosystem and Vision

  • TanStack is more than a single library — it’s a well-scoped suite:

    • @tanstack/query – Data fetching and caching
    • @tanstack/table – Headless table logic
    • @tanstack/router – Type-safe routing with layouts and loaders
    • @tanstack/virtual – High-performance virtualization
  • This makes community building and cross-project governance more manageable.

5. Strong Precedents

  • Other frontend libraries like jQuery, ESLint, and webpack have successfully joined OpenJS.
  • TanStack’s influence and adoption are on par with many of these projects.

⚠️ Potential Challenges or Misfits

1. Desire for Independence

  • Tanner Linsley has historically preferred independent governance and lean processes.
  • OpenJS introduces more structured governance — potentially slowing iteration or adding overhead.

2. Licensing & Commercial Strategy

  • TanStack Table Pro uses a commercial license.

    • OpenJS permits commercial models, but separation between open-source governance and monetization would need clarity.
    • May require adjustments to licensing strategy or clearer documentation of boundaries.

3. Time and Governance Overhead

  • Joining OpenJS brings:

    • Regular governance meetings
    • Contributor onboarding policies
    • Compliance with foundation-wide initiatives
  • It’s not just a benefit — it’s also a long-term commitment.


🧭 Verdict

TanStack is an ideal technical and community candidate for OpenJS Foundation membership. ⚠️ The only blocker would be if the core team prefers full independence or is unwilling to shift to shared governance.

If sustainability, community trust, and long-term stewardship are goals for TanStack, then joining the OpenJS Foundation would be a highly strategic move.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment