WProperty prototype

gistfile1.txt

/* 
||
|| @author         Alexander Brevig <[email protected]>
|| @url            http://wiring.org.co/
|| @contribution   Brett Hagman <[email protected]>
|| @contribution   Hernando Barragan <[email protected]>
||
|| @description
|| | A public field wrapper for providing assignment safe guards
|| #
||
|| @license Please see cores/Common/License.txt.
||
*/

#ifndef WPROPERTY_H
#define WPROPERTY_H

/*
|| A basic property, semantically equivalent of a regular public field
*/
template<typename T>
class Property
{
  public:
    Property() { }

    Property<T> &operator=(const T rhs) {
      value = rhs;
      return *this;
    }

    operator T() {
      return value;
    }

  private:
    T value;
};

/*
|| A property that implement assignment rules
*/
template<typename T>
class ConstrainedProperty
{
  public:
    typedef bool (*comp_fn)(T);

    ConstrainedProperty(comp_fn _comparator) : comparator(_comparator) { }

    ConstrainedProperty<T> &operator=(const T rhs) {
      if (comparator == 0 || comparator(rhs)) {
        value = rhs;
      }

      return *this;
    }

    operator T() { return value; }

    operator T() const { return T(); }

  private:
    T value;
    comp_fn comparator;
};

/*
|| A constant property for reading a private member field
*/
template<typename T>
class ConstantProperty
{
  public:
    typedef bool (*comp_fn)(T);

    ConstantProperty(T &ref) : validator(0), valuePointer(&ref) { }

    ConstantProperty(comp_fn _validator, T &ref) : validator(_validator), valuePointer(&ref) { }

    ConstantProperty<T> &operator=(const T rhs) {
      if (validator == 0 || validator(rhs)) {
        if (valuePointer != 0) {
          *valuePointer = rhs;
        }
      }

      return *this;
    }

    operator T() { return *valuePointer; }

    operator T() const { return T(); }

  private:
    T *valuePointer;
    comp_fn validator;
};

#endif

I don't think we need to validation function any more in the plain-jane Property.

https://gist.github.com/AlexanderBrevig/6217627#file-gistfile1-txt-L26

Also, I think that we should name the validation functions in ConstrainedProperty and ConstantProperty to validator or validation.

What do you think?

I completely agree, updated gist