Discord.js v12 Inline Reply Powered by npmjs.com/discord-reply EASY!!! For help: https://www.npmjs.com/package/discord-reply

index.js

const discord = require('discord.js');
require('discord-reply'); //⚠️ IMPORTANT: put this before your discord.Client()
const client = new discord.Client();

client.on('ready', () => {
  console.log(client.user.tag)
});

client.on('message', async message => {
  if (message.content.startsWith('!reply')) {
    message.lineReply('Hey');
    message.lineReply(`My name is ${client.user.username}`, false); //true = mention | false = without mention
  }
  
  if (message.content.startsWith('!edit')) {
    let m = await message.lineReply('This will be editied', false);
    setTimeout(() => {
      m.edit('Successfully editied');
     }, 1000)
  }
});

client.login('TOKEN');

/**
 * You can use
 * message.lineReplyNoMention()
 * method or
 * message.lineReply('content', false)
 * if yout don't want mention
 * */

reply.js

/**
 * No need to define it
 * */
module.exports = {
  name: 'reply',
  category: 'Test',
  run: (client, message, args) => {
    message.lineReply('This is reply with @mention');
  }
}

that is like making the food then getting it all apart so unnecessary

Bruh are you even seeing the npm package Angelo is using a npm package not custom code bruh and no your not a god ok?

??? seems you don't know how the package works

are u stupid?

We won't deal with the kids

If you need i can re-code from 0 -_-

i don't need it, i just need a confession

WhoEver is Allvaa please stop i saw your inline reply code and it doesn't make sense to extending 2 classes for no reason.

dude, who is extending classes for no reason even tho both classes is used LMAO

i previously didn't extend 2 classes, i just update it yesterday, i made that just to support the replied_user option on the edit method

well, i actually don't care who was the first. it's all about who wrote that code