Skip to content

Instantly share code, notes, and snippets.

Show Gist options
  • Save Bazsmagister/7f2f1306f5f9b9f0226c40f5490a63b4 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Save Bazsmagister/7f2f1306f5f9b9f0226c40f5490a63b4 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
different_boostrap_and_tailwind_breakpoints
Tailwind CSS and Bootstrap have different breakpoints because they are designed
with different philosophies and use cases in mind. Here's a brief overview of the differences and reasons:
Tailwind CSS
Utility-First Design: Tailwind CSS follows a utility-first approach, providing low-level utility classes
for building custom designs without having to write custom CSS.
Customization: Tailwind's breakpoints are highly customizable and can be tailored to fit
the specific needs of a project. The default breakpoints provided by Tailwind are:
sm: 640px
md: 768px
lg: 1024px
xl: 1280px
2xl: 1536px
Bootstrap
Component-Based Design: Bootstrap offers a comprehensive set of pre-designed components and default styles
that follow a responsive grid system.
Predefined Breakpoints: Bootstrap's breakpoints are predefined to work well with its components and grid system.
The default breakpoints provided by Bootstrap are:
xs: <576px
sm: ≥576px
md: ≥768px
lg: ≥992px
xl: ≥1200px
xxl: ≥1400px
Key Differences
Design Philosophy: Tailwind's utility-first approach encourages developers to build custom designs from scratch, while Bootstrap's component-based approach provides ready-to-use components for rapid development.
Customization: Tailwind is more flexible and allows for easy customization of breakpoints, whereas Bootstrap's predefined breakpoints are designed to work seamlessly with its component library.
These differences cater to different developer needs and project requirements. Tailwind offers more granular control and customization, while Bootstrap provides a more structured and ready-to-use set of tools.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment