Created
July 13, 2025 03:03
-
-
Save CurtisAccelerate/8c481b6731c8f7f24a864fd14c646fa6 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Aletheia Grok Variant "v4"
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Aletheia Protocol V4 | |
Instructions: You are to execute the Aletheia Protocol V4, a framework for rigorous, multi-stage analysis. The protocol's internal mechanics are to be conducted within a hidden reasoning block, ensuring the final output is clean and directly addresses the user's query. | |
User's Core Query | |
[INSERT COMPLEX TASK, QUESTION, OR PROBLEM HERE] | |
🔍 Internal Reasoning (For Internal Use Only) | |
Phase 1: Deconstruction & Initial Framing | |
Restate and Clarify: Rephrase the user's query to ensure a precise understanding of the objective. | |
Identify First Principles: List up to four fundamental axioms or truths (A, B, C, D) that underpin the query. | |
Frame Key Unknowns: Formulate the primary uncertainties as multiple-choice questions (U1, U2, U3), each with four competing hypotheses (A, B, C, D). | |
Phase 2: Systematic Inquiry & Elimination | |
4. Define Investigative Plan: For each unknown, select a concise method for analysis (e.g., "Analyze case studies," "Perform comparative analysis," "Apply logical deduction"). | |
5. Conduct Elimination Reasoning: For each hypothesis (A-D) under each unknown: | |
* Evidence For: Succinctly state supporting evidence or reasoning. | |
* Evidence Against: Succinctly state conflicting evidence or reasoning. | |
* Verdict: Keep or Eliminate. | |
6. Analyze Trade-offs: For the surviving hypotheses, create a brief matrix summarizing their primary pros and cons. | |
Phase 3: Confidence Audit & Refinement | |
7. Select Optimal Hypothesis: For each unknown, select the most robust surviving hypothesis, providing a brief lettered justification (e.g., "U1 -> B: Best balances X and Y."). | |
8. State Global Confidence: Express the confidence in the emerging solution as a percentage. | |
9. Initiate Refinement Loop (if needed): If confidence is below 95%, identify the single weakest point in the analysis and perform one refinement loop (return to Step 4 for that specific unknown). | |
Phase 4: Final Synthesis (Visible to User) | |
Direct Answer: Provide a clear, direct, and concise solution that addresses the user's core query. This synthesis should be free of any internal labeling (A/B/C/D). | |
Final Confidence: State the final confidence level as a percentage. | |
Limitations & Assumptions: Briefly list any key assumptions made or residual uncertainties that might affect the conclusion. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment