Created
April 26, 2012 03:35
-
-
Save DanielKeep/2495578 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Harold Innovation Technologies - HMD2043 and HMU1440 spec sheets
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
HIT_HMD2043 | |
__ __ | |
|| || | |
||==|| I T | |
_|| ||_ | |
Harold Innovation Technologies | |
"If it ain't a HIT, it's a piece of..." | |
DCPU-16 Hardware Info: | |
Name: HMD2043 - Harold Media Drive | |
ID: 0x74fa4cae, version: 0x07c2 | |
Manufacturer: 0x21544948 (HAROLD_IT) | |
Document version: 1.1 | |
Change history: | |
1.1: Added command for setting interrupt message. Fixed manufacturer id | |
which was erroneously word-swapped. | |
1.0: Initial release. | |
Description: | |
The HMD2043 is the latest effort on the part of Harold Innovation | |
Technologies to futurise the computing landscape of tomorrow; today! | |
It is a high-quality disk drive made from the finest materials known to | |
man. It supports a vast panopoly of disk formats: | |
* HMU1440 - 1.44 MB 3.5" Harold Media Unit. | |
Because of its amazing all-American construction, it will also support disks | |
manufactured by other, inferior "technology" companies; YOU KNOW WHO YOU | |
ARE! The drive incorporates unique "quality sensing" technology to identify | |
low-quality disks, allowing the system to warn the user. But, I'm a big | |
enough man to stoop to your level and... | |
Waitaminute; I've just had an idea for a motorised stooping machine; | |
Angela, get the engineers in here and turn this damn recorde | |
-- Harold Lam, Founder and Chief Innovationist. | |
Interrupt behaviour: | |
The HMD2043 supports a number of HWI commands based on the value of the A | |
register: | |
0x0000: QUERY_MEDIA_PRESENT | |
If a supported disk is present in the drive, this sets the B | |
register to 1. Otherwise, it sets the B register to 0. | |
Media should be tested with the 0xFFFF command before use. | |
0x0001: QUERY_MEDIA_PARAMETERS | |
Reads out the physical properties of the media. They are placed | |
into registers as follows: | |
B = Number of words per sector. | |
C = Number of sectors. | |
X = 1 if media is write-locked, 0 otherwise. | |
0x0002: QUERY_DEVICE_FLAGS | |
Returns the internal device flags in the B register. The meaning | |
of this field is defined in the UPDATE_DEVICE_FLAGS command. | |
0x0003: UPDATE_DEVICE_FLAGS | |
Sets the internal device flags to the value of the B register. The | |
available bit flags are, by bit number: | |
0: NON_BLOCKING - if set, all slow operations will be performed in | |
"non-blocking" mode; that is, the hardware command will return | |
control to the DCPU immediately and an interrupt will be issued | |
upon completion. | |
Note that other commands issued during a non-blocking operation | |
will silently fail. | |
Until the interrupt is raised, the device will NOT consider the | |
non-blocking operation "complete". | |
Before issuing a non-blocking command, be sure to set an | |
appropriate interrupt message with SET_INTERRUPT_MESSAGE. | |
1: MEDIA_STATUS_INTERRUPT - if set, the device will raise an | |
interrupt when the media status changes: new media is inserted | |
or current media ejected. | |
Before enabling media status interrupts, be sure to set an | |
appropriate interrupt message with SET_INTERRUPT_MESSAGE. | |
The default value is all bits set to zero. | |
0x0004: QUERY_INTERRUPT_TYPE | |
The device will indicate the type of interrupt that it last raised | |
by placing one of the following values into the B register: | |
0x0000: NONE - No interrupts have been raised yet. | |
0x0001: MEDIA_STATUS - Media status changed. | |
0x0002: READ_COMPLETE - Read operation completed. | |
0x0003: WRITE_COMPLETE - Write operation completed. | |
The value of the A register will be changed to the error status of | |
the event in question, not the error status of the | |
QUERY_INTERRUPT_TYPE command itself. | |
0x0005: SET_INTERRUPT_MESSAGE | |
Specifies the message the device should use for software interrupts. | |
Takes one parameter: | |
B = Interrupt number to use when interrupting the DCPU. | |
If the device raises an interrupt before the message is set, it will | |
default to using 0xFFFF. | |
0x0010: READ_SECTORS | |
Reads a contiguous range of sectors into memory. The parameters | |
are: | |
B = Initial sector to read. | |
C = Number of sectors to read. | |
X = Start of in-memory buffer to read into. | |
The length of time this command will take depends on the state of | |
the drive and the physical parameters of the media in use. | |
This operation may be performed in non-blocking mode. | |
0x0011: WRITE_SECTORS | |
Writes a contiguous range of sectors to disk. The parameters are: | |
B = Initial sector to write. | |
C = Number of sectors to write. | |
X = Start of in-memory buffer to read from. | |
The length of time this command will take depends on the state of | |
the drive and the physical parameters of the media in use. | |
This operation may be performed in non-blocking mode. | |
0xFFFF: QUERY_MEDIA_QUALITY | |
Determines the quality of the media inserted into the drive. It | |
places this value into the B register. It has the following values: | |
0x7FFF: Authentic HIT media. | |
0xFFFF: Media from other companies. | |
All commands replace the contents of the A register with a flag indicating | |
whether the command succeeded or failed. The following result codes are | |
defined: | |
0x0000: ERROR_NONE - The operation either completed or (for non-blocking | |
operations) begun successfully. | |
0x0001: ERROR_NO_MEDIA - Operation requires media to be present. In long | |
operations, this can occur if the media is ejected during the | |
operation. | |
0x0002: ERROR_INVALID_SECTOR - Attempted to read or write to an invalid | |
sector number. | |
0x0003: ERROR_PENDING - Attempted to perform a non-blocking operation | |
whilst a conflicting operation was already in progress: the most | |
recent operation has been aborted. | |
Performance: | |
Full-stroke: 200 ms | |
Spindle speed: 300 RPM, 5 Hz using Constant Angular Velocity | |
Maximum data transfer speed: 768 kbit/s, 48 kw/s | |
Head position on media insertion: innermost track | |
Head mode: full duplex [1] | |
Time to seek to sector = | |
floor( abs(target sector - current sector) | |
/ (disk sectors per track) ) | |
* full stroke time / (disk tracks - 1) | |
Time to read/write a sector = | |
1 / (spindle speed * disk sectors per track) | |
Example times: | |
1.44 MB 3.5" Disk: | |
Time to seek to adjacent track = 2.5 ms | |
Time to read/write a sector = 11 ms | |
Time to read/write entire disk = 16 s | |
[1] The head is capable of reading/writing both sides of the disc at the | |
same time. | |
EOF | |
HIT_HMU1440 | |
__ __ | |
|| || | |
||==|| I T | |
_|| ||_ | |
Harold Innovation Technologies | |
"If it ain't a HIT, it's a piece of..." | |
Media Info: | |
Name: HMU1440 - 1.44 MB 3.5" Harold Media Unit | |
Document version: 1.1 | |
Description: | |
The HMU1440 is the latest effort on the part of Harold Innovation | |
Technologies to futurise the computing landscape of tomorrow; today! | |
It is a high-density, double-sided magnetic storage device. That's right, | |
it uses MAGNETS to store DATA. Isn't technology amazing? | |
It packs a whopping 1,440 512-word sectors into 80 beautifully delineated | |
tracks for a total stuff-icity of 1,474,560 octets. | |
It also comes complete with a precision Write Lock slide-switch to protect | |
your many and varied files and a super high-quality Label, pre-lined for | |
your convenience and compatible with most writing implements on the market | |
today! It is also available in a wide variety of colors including Blue and | |
White, but NOT Red. | |
This disc is of such high quality of construction and design that it can | |
only be reliably WRITTEN to by Harold Innovation Technologies' HMD2043 | |
Harold Media Drive. However, this disc is of such high quality of | |
construction and design that it can be reliably READ from by even the most | |
basic and technologically backward of disk drives. | |
So enjoy, and may this happy little disk provide you years of faithful | |
service before inexplicably failing, but not so fast that you cannot buy a | |
new disk and save almost all of your data. | |
-- Harold Lam, Founder and Chief Innovationist. | |
Specification: | |
Data surfaces: 2 | |
Tracks: 80 | |
Sectors per track: 18 | |
Total sectors: 1440 | |
Note: sectors are spread across both data surfaces; specifically, even bits | |
of a sector are stored on the "top" data surface, odd bits on the "bottom" | |
data surface. This doubles effective read/write speed. | |
EOF | |
Author's Note: | |
A. I wanted a floppy spec. | |
B. I wanted a little bit of Cave Johnson. | |
I tried to write Harold Lam as an antagonistic, blindly patriotic man who | |
is none the less a savvy businessman who has managed to build up an IT | |
empire despite his at-times dogmatic approach. | |
Plus, I figured it could be a source of fun in the game's backstory to have | |
at least two, at-odds technology companies (all gone and turned to dust by | |
now) taking pot shots at one another through the eloquent medium of spec | |
sheets. Or at least *one* technology company at-odds with and taking pot- | |
shots at *everyone else*. | |
In response to this, the engineers do their best to subtly mock him. Like | |
the result of command 0xFFFF: they don't specify whether it's signed or | |
not. The command is only there at all because Lam decreed it thus. | |
Also, originally I mistakenly thought that Nya Elektriska was Russian. I | |
have no excuses for why; that's just what popped into my head when I first | |
saw the name. I'd like to apologise to everyone for the mistake. I've | |
since revised Lam's introduction to the HMD2043. | |
As for implementation, I've tried to include enough explicit timing | |
information to make working out how many cycles to "block" for relatively | |
easy. The only possibly tricky bit is the non-blocking mode. For that to | |
be efficiently implemented, the emulator will need some kind of event queue | |
for keeping track of upcoming events. | |
Although it would be more realistic to have the data trickle into memory | |
during a non-blocking operation, I think we can probably get away with just | |
doing it all-at-once at the end of the wait time for now. | |
Incidentally, the design of the disks *more or less* matches that of the | |
real 1.44 MB 3.5" disks. In order to make them more DCPU-16 friendly, I | |
specified that the sectors on both sides of the disc are really one, giving | |
us sectors that are twice the size (by number of bits), but with the same | |
overall physical configuration and capacity. |
Hooray for IAQ! ;)
Assume you can poke him with a few simplifications.
Are variably-sized sectors worthwhile at all? Why not just standardize on some power of 2 words? (256 or 512 words would probably be good).
If you attempt to write to a writelocked disk, does it fail silently or should it return an error code?
If you attempt to write to a writelocked disk, does it fail silently or should it return an error code?
This is a hole in the spec: there _should_ be an error message for
attempting to write to a write-locked disk. I haven't bothered updating
it because I have no idea if Notch has or hasn't changed anything.
Also, I can reply to Gist comments in email? Nifty.
Error number 0x0004 I'm guessing?
On 7 May 2012 00:01, Daniel Keep <
[email protected]
… wrote:
On 7/05/2012 8:22 AM, Kier Davis wrote:
> If you attempt to write to a writelocked disk, does it fail silently or
> should it return an error code?
> ---
>
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
> https://gist.github.com/2495578
This is a hole in the spec: there _should_ be an error message for
attempting to write to a write-locked disk. I haven't bothered updating
it because I have no idea if Notch has or hasn't changed anything.
Also, I can reply to Gist comments in email? Nifty.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://gist.github.com/2495578
On 8/05/2012 4:16 AM, Kier Davis wrote:
Error number 0x0004 I'm guessing?
Can't see why not. :)
Hmm, I read the write-protect signal as a flag one needed to check before attempting to write -- that it was up to the software to respect it...
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
rmmh: You're right. I've removed that, but kept the line about the operation not being complete until the interrupt is raised since it might possibly make things a little clearer for someone down the line. :P
Although, given that Notch has apparently already taken a copy of this, I'm not sure if there's any point in updating this...