{"questions":[{"id":17,"text":"Should \"deceptive design patterns\" on the internet be illegal?","supp_info":"{\"type\":\"doc\",\"content\":[{\"type\":\"bulletList\",\"attrs\":{\"diffType\":\"\"},\"content\":[{\"type\":\"listItem\",\"attrs\":{\"diffType\":\"\"},\"content\":[{\"type\":\"paragraph\",\"attrs\":{\"diffType\":\"\"},\"content\":[{\"type\":\"text\",\"text\":\"\\\"deceptive design patterns\\\" are aspects of digital interfaces that obscure its behavior and/or manipulate users into taking certain actions, often against their best interests. A database of some patterns, examples and connected legal cases is \"},{\"type\":\"text\",\"marks\":[{\"type\":\"link\",\"attrs\":{\"href\":\"https://www.deceptive.design/types\",\"target\":\"_blank\",\"rel\":\"noopener noreferrer nofollow\",\"class\":null}}],\"text\":\"here\"}]}]}]}]}","created_at":"2024-01-22T15:01:32.838Z","suppInfoHTML":"<ul><li><p>"deceptive design patterns" are aspects of digital interfaces that obscure its behavior and/or manipulat |
{ | |
"promptLists": { | |
"endOfChapterReview": { | |
"embedPath": { | |
"before": true, | |
"cssSelector": | |
"html body main#main.wb div.content nav.pagination.hidden-print" | |
}, | |
"promptsByFrontText": [ | |
"Why might over-specifying a design make it harder to estimate?", |
Lately, I've been thinking about hypocrisy and inconsistency. Frankly, I think there are some shenanigans going on!
I'm going to try to flesh out a bit of what hypocrisy is and then build up some of the ways that I've seen hypocrisy in action and a few common pitfalls that we walk into.
By definition, it's the act of promoting or claiming to live by a certain set of rules (e.g. a moral code) but behaving in a way that does not follow those rules. There's a disconnect between what is spoken about and what is done.
There's almost always a very negative connotation and I'm not sure there's much room for positivity in the definition. It's a breach of trust and trust is one of the most important social tenets that we uphold.
Intent doesn't really matter that much. It's obviously much worse if the person is purposefully creating the disconnect because they'd be explicitly deceiving people, but I'd argue that we don't even need that much distrust to treat someone with apprehension.
Lately I've been thinking about the crosses that people bear, how they got there and this lil' ol' thing called "toxic* giving".
- *after a few test-drives, I officially endorse the usage of the word "toxic" in its social connotation. It's not a reflection of the coddled over-sensitive snowflake culture that wouldn't have won the war. It is an acknowledgement that we can be shitty to each other in a variety of subtle ways and that these can have just as meaningful impacts as even physical stresses.
To start, it'll be helpful to align on some basics of give-and-take to see the possibilities of over-giving or under-taking.
DISCLAIMER: I hope this doesn't come across as "mansplaining", but rather a helpful bridge between our two understandings and the coloring-in of a mental picture that I hope we both can see. Too often we talk at cross purposes because we don't take the time to establish the simplest parts of an idea. If we can't align on the small stuff, how can we do so on the big s
Lately, I've been thinking about being a beginner.
There's immense value in trying out new things, extending from a personal to a cosmic scale. If no one began anything then nothing would happen, except all those old things (blegh). No matter what it is, whether a simple new hobby, an endeavour of self-improvement or a Herculean task of great import, going through the process has value in-and-of itself and is the only consistent route to truly great things. So! We should keep doing it!
---- Begin long-winded rant on the value of trying new things in relation to fulfillment ----
There's no "right way to live", as far as I've seen. Even theistic religions keep to some core tenets and give a lot of room for maneuvering. There've gotta be better ways to live, though. There are big questions that we'll never answer or tricky bits of morality that we're still figuring out, but aside from these we know some things that are just better, especially at a personal scale.
"To each their own" we say, with un
Lately, I've been thinking about "being meta".
It, being such a gosh darn abstract and fundamental idea, can be applied to many things*. Meta jokes, meta movies, meta-cognitive skills, meta-analysis of people, arguments and behaviors. I'm slightly upset that Facebook's rebranding is trying to devalue this word, so, if you can, keeping calling them Facebook.
- * you're welcome for this banal* statement
- * I heard this word recently and really wanted to use it. It means "so obvious as to be boring". Plz use it now, ty.
Meta means "above" or "outside of". For content, we mostly mean that the content is self-referential, or "aware of itself". "Breaking the fourth wall" (roughly: acknowledging the audience) is meta.
For processes in general, we mostly mean that it considers each element in a broader context than the one in which we first encounter it. A meta look at an argument might find someone is just constantly playing "devil's advocate" and not actually engaging with the conversation. The same words
daunted by many problems, not doing anything to help, paralyzed by apriori concerns
It's all too much sometimes.
What is ?
All of the problems in the world, all of the problems I have in my life, the things I'd like to do weighed against the things I end up doing. How shitty people are. Y'know...all of it?
That does sound like a lot. How do these things affect you here and now, though? Results require time and effort. They're incremental! So, what progress can you make today?
google search for: https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-d&q=socket+io+game+server+architecture
n/a
quick overview of a co-op jigsaw puzzle game
- a central server for "high level tasks" e.g. player connection
I've been thinking about the internet.
I'm going to try and describe some phenomenon that I think a lot of people experience related to the internet, why I think they're not great, why these personal things matter to us all and then list out a couple strategies that have helped me deal with them.
In general, I've found that discussions of these topics are a bit dimissive and downplay just how strong of an impact our usage of the internet has on us. I'll try to avoid being a doomsayer and rather just try to explain.
I used to think about the internet as a place that I went to. I knew when I was there because I had to do something to get there: plug in a CD or use up the phone line. Now, the internet is everywhere. It's expected* and we're constantly finding new ways to embed it in our lives. It's hard to even tell sometimes when something is connected or not. I didn't even realize that smart TVs were serving me ads until last year. This pervaviseness lends the internet a