AI coding agents (Claude Code, Cursor, Codex) make the same categories of mistakes:
- Editing files outside task scope — agent "helpfully" refactors a file you didn't ask it to touch
- Hallucinating function signatures — calls a function with wrong params, breaks the build
- Making unauthorized changes — modifies config files, env vars, or deployment scripts without confirmation
- Ignoring instructions — skips test files, deletes comments, reformats code you told it not to touch
The current "fix" is post-hoc: review the diff, catch the mistake, revert. But by then, if it was a force-push or a deploy, the damage is done.
Instead of reviewing failures after they happen, intercept the tool call before it executes:
function preEditGate(filePath, editContent, taskContext) {
if (!taskContext.allowedPaths.some(p => filePath.startsWith(p))) {
return { allowed: false, reason: `${filePath} is outside authorized scope` };
}
if (PROTECTED_PATTERNS.some(p => filePath.match(p))) {
return { allowed: false, reason: `${filePath} is protected` };
}
return { allowed: true };
}When you thumbs-down a bad output, capture the file path, model output, your correction, and failure pattern. Auto-promote repeated patterns into prevention rules. After 3 identical failures, the gate blocks that action class automatically.
npx thumbgate- Free tier: 2 feedback captures/day, 3 auto-promoted rules
- Pro: $19/mo — unlimited rules, team sharing, audit trail
- 862 weekly NPM installs
GitHub: https://github.com/IgorGanapolsky/ThumbGate Docs: https://thumbgate.ai
Full AI Automation Reliability Diagnostic ($499): https://buy.stripe.com/00w28r1M82iWaK50XN3sI37